Not-So-Hidden Agenda: Strategic and Economic Assessments of U.S. led Invasion in the Middle East
Pre War Analysis, March 19, 2003
I've gotten a lot of requests -- and some terrific feedback -- on this since Dave Farber mentioned it on his Interesting People list.
An abstract is below. Perhaps at some future date we'll tackle what the potential pitfalls might be of our 10 year, $1 trillion dollar stay in Iraq.
Feel free to post any comments or intelligent criticisms here; If you are shy you can email them (privately).
A strategic assessment of the imminent War and its economic impact, based on “open source” materials. Several unexpected conclusions are reached: First, the explanations offerred by the nation’s leadership for military action is inadequate to explain the US commitment to any invasion. Second, by “reverse engineering” the strategic decision making process, we learn there may indeed be compelling reasons for invading and occupying Iraq.
These findings lead to the conclusion that any U.S. military presence in the Middle East is likely to be a large scale, continuing operation. The subsequent occupation of Iraq may last several years, and continue for a decade. The cost for this effort could scale up to one trillion dollars by 2011.
Lastly, we attempt to assess the impact the War will have on the equity and fixed income markets; We also apply those findings to specific market sectors and industries. Finally, we suggest how asset managers may wish to position their portfolios in the months and years ahead.
I continue to refer to this document. In fact, I searched once again for it this evening, to post the link (for at least the fourth time) to JohnMac's list.
How sadly prescient your analysis has been.
Posted by: John | Mar 15, 2006 8:09:33 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.