3 Peaks and a Domed House ?
I use a variety of methodologies in my work. Charts are absolutely one of the essential tools I use. However, the way I apply of technical analysis may be different than the work of pure technicians out there. I use charts primarily to tell me, in order of importance, 3 things:
- Is the stock/sector/index/market in an up trend or a down trend?
- Where is the nearest resistance or support level?
- Are there any reliable patterns suggesting an imminent reversal (or continuation) pattern?
You'll note pattern recognition was last. I have found pattern recognition is a complex art, prone to human errors in interpretation. I use it, but sparingly so. The information imparted by trend and resistance/support analysis is very quick and reliable when compared with pattern analysis. (Perhaps that just means Im a lousy technician).
Regardless, there are occasions when the patterns are ominously clear. One such instance has arisen that warrants my sharing it with you: George Lindsays Three Peaks and the Domed House (TP&tDH). The parallels between the present market's progression and Lindsays ideal formation are startling.
If youve been reading this site for a while, you know that I track Contrary Indicators closely; that I have been (mostly) Bullish for the past six months, but increasingly uncomfortable with that posture; that we advocated a rotation out of tech early October; that I am far less sanguine about the economic recovery than most of my peers; that last Wednesday (10/15), I interpreted the VIX as signalling an imminent correction which appears to be in full swing now.
Against that backdrop, I was somewhat stunned when someone showed Ned Davis Research's interpretation of Three Peaks and the Domed House. (See chart below). NDR is a highly respected independent research house; Davis himself has had many terrific calls over the past few years. (He also has the cleanest stock market data in existence).
I have no idea what the track record of 3 Peaks and a Domed House is (though Lindsay has a stellar reputation); I saw how parallel the charts appeared, noted that hardly anyone else (other than Ned Davis) was talking about them, and posted this.
![]()
Source: Ned Davis Research
It is only with great trepidation that I show Lindsay's Idealized pattern. It is scary. Ive also seen parallel presentations of the same form in the period leading up to March 2000 (we know how that turned out). I have no experience with either the application or interpretation of TP&tDH. I present here to provoke your thought processes a bit. I have also included several reference links on the pattern and on Lindsay himself (below).
If you care to do additional research on this pattern, here's a few links to start you off:
Reference to George Lindsay:
Essential Technical Analysis
(click the link Search inside this book; Go to the search box and type "George Lindsay")
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/047115279X/thebigpictu09 20/103-3937756-4643047
Reference to Three Peaks and the Domed House:
Sand Spring Advisors
Three Peaks and the Domed House - Revisited, January 14, 2000
http://www.sandspring.com/articles/tp.html
Bonds & Gold
http://www.nqoos.com/3peaks_Lindsay.htm
SPX Daily
http://www.nqoos.com/3peaks_Discovery.htm
DJIA (Crosscurrents)
(go 2/3rds of the way down or search for the word "Domed")
http://www.cross-currents.net/archives/oct01.htm
Friday, October 24, 2003 | 06:05 PM | Permalink
| Comments (2)
| TrackBack (0)
add to de.li.cious |
digg this! |
add to technorati |
email this post
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d834217b0153ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 3 Peaks and a Domed House ?:
Comments
lindsay's three peaks and a domed house looks like a 4th wave triangle and a 5 wave impulse in elliott wave analysis. a triangle for the 4th wave is usually the last correction in an advance and the 5 waves up from the 4th wave low is, then, a peak of the advance. the value line seems to have completed 5 waves from the october low.
Posted by: charles | Oct 26, 2003 1:58:59 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.






