UK Albums Have a Record Year in 2003 (yet the U.S. is moribund; Why?)

Saturday, February 21, 2004 | 07:18 AM

bbc_news.gif

Here's an interesting little factoid you may not have noticed: In 2003, the number of artist albums sold in the UK in 2003 rose more than 7% to almost 121 million.

The UK music industry magazine "Music Week" shows artist albums - and that excludes compilation albums - sold 120,968,891 in 2003.

That total is a rise of 7.6% from the previous year, according to the BBC.

Which raises a question: Why are CD sales in the UK doing so well, while the U.S. music industry has seen continual erosion of music sales since the late 90s?

Here are the 3 key differences between the U.S. and U.K. music industries:

Radio concentration: The UK does not have the same degree of ownership concentration that is in the U.S. There is no dominant player like ClearChannel Communications in Great Britain;

Stronger Economy: The U.K. did not suffer the same degree of post bubble effects as did the U.S. Indeed, the British Pound is up dramatically against the U.S. Dollar. They simply did not have nearly as severe a downturn. Hence, their consumers did not cut back on purchases the way we did in the States;

More Creative Musical Environment: Call it a lack of "insipid boy bands." The British have always had a terrficially vibrant musical scene: From Beatlemania to the British Invasion to the Clash and the punk sound, the British Isles have produced as vastly disproportionate amount of great music relative to their size and population. And, with a much lower ownership concentration of radio stations, which must compete with an extensive public broadcasting system (the Beeb), there is a rich and diverse set of offerings over the public airwaves;

The bottom line is that the U.S. music market is suffering from infrastruture issues which are negatively impacting record sales. Some of it is broader macro economic factors; Parts are legislatively based -- allowing ever increasing concentration of radio station ownership reduces the amount of music which gets heard by the CD buying population.

Some if it is just those goddamned insipid boy bands . . .


Source:
Albums have a record year in 2003
By Stephen Dowling
BBC News, Wednesday, 14 January, 2004, 13:06 GMT
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/3392825.stm

Saturday, February 21, 2004 | 07:18 AM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d8345aa0e069e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference UK Albums Have a Record Year in 2003 (yet the U.S. is moribund; Why?):

Comments

It may also be because the UK's lower access to broadband/ unmetered internet access means that file-sharing isn't affecting the UK sales as badly as in the US (yet). About the most creative band in the UK top 20 this week is ... the Strokes.

Posted by: Gabriel | Feb 21, 2004 9:14:45 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner