Why GDP is Soft, and is likely to stay that way

Saturday, January 29, 2005 | 02:41 PM

Yesterday's GDP number was a downside surprise --  at least to some. I love when CNBC schedules mega-Bulls for Squawk Box, and then  hits 'em with a nasty number that leaves 'em stammering.

Its a good thing.

This is not a 4%+ economy. Are we all clear on that now? Good.  I've been an outlier on the GDP numbers for a while, on the low end of the scale (2.5-3.25%).

Yesterday, they came to papa: 

Wsj_econ_chartsgdp_01282005_2Its apparent that the 2003 Tax cuts had a huge, albeit temporary impact on consumer spending. The Q3 2003 spike was shows that the maximum impact was only transitory. As the datapoints continue to make clear, it was mostly a one time shot of adrenaline, with attenuating impact on the macro environment. As we mentioned in The Frankenstein Economy, once the tax cut stimulus faded, there would be little in the way of organic self-sustaining growth -- business hiring, capex spending, and even on durable goods.   

This is an inherent problem with stimulating the stock market, and hoping it leads, rather than stimulating the economy, and hoping the stock market  follows.

Now, as all the prior stimulus fades -- as interest rates go higher, the tax breaks fade, the deficit spending starts scaring the senate -- something else must be found to replace the spent fuel in order to continue the economic expansion and power the market higher.

What might that be . . .?

Well, it could be accomodative interest rates, but that seems to be unlikely . . .  Or it could be the continued weak dollar policy, which everyone but John Snow seems to be willing to acknowledge in public. Or it could be another massive tax cut, something increasingly unlikely to take place.

More deficit spending via public works? Unlikely with this administration.

Hey, I have an idea! How about another significant War? Good for the economy, its an acceptable form of deficit spending to the supply siders, and its (somewhat) stimulative, in a (Shhhh!) Keynsian sort of way.

Too bad there aren't any imminent threats or targets on the horizon . . .

Saturday, January 29, 2005 | 02:41 PM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d8346f78e869e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why GDP is Soft, and is likely to stay that way:

Comments

No significant imminenet threats on the horizon? Some good candidates of course but maybe not imminent. May be good for the fading economy but not so good for the budget deficit.

Posted by: Ralph | Jan 29, 2005 9:10:26 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner