Uh-Oh: Apple on the Cover of Fortune

Sunday, February 13, 2005 | 06:30 PM

And just when things were going so well: Apple is the cover story of this month's Fortune. Recall January 2004, when we noted Uh oh: Forbes Cover Screams "Tech is Back!"

Call it the curse of the magazine indicator. Paul Krugman's quote on the subject is infamous: “Whom the Gods would destroy, they first put on the cover of Business Week.”

To be fair, most of the work I've done on the magazine cover indicator focuses on macro or sector issues: Bull or Bear Markets, specific sectors, Energy/oil, low carb/Atkins, etc. It works better with mainstream publications than with Business mags.

The ultimate example of mag cover timing was Time's Man of the Year: Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos towards the end of 1999. I noted this in a column on contrary indicators for TheStreet.com in 2001. Time's timing was flawless; When they bestowed that honorific on Bezos, Amazon's stock was near its high of $113. It closed 2000 as a teen-ager -- under $16. That's an 86% decrease.

But the best interpretation of that cover was less in nailing the top in Amazon (which it did), but rather, in calling the top for the entire internet bubble -- which Time did within a few months of the penultimate peak. That's damn good timing. BTW, you can have some fun with this by reviewing the entire history of Time's Person of the Year. Does the complete list (1927-2004) reveal a greater tendency to catch the early parts of a trend -- or the opposite, namely, the tail end?

Caveat:  I cannot say with confidence that it works as well for individual companies. Sure, you can find Cisco, Dell or EMC on many covers in 1999 and 2000. But these same companies, along with Intel, Micorsoft, Sun, Oracle and dozens more, were on many covers for many years -- and hundreds of points -- prior.

Lastly, Ed Seykota makes the astute observation that the Magazine Cover Indicator works best with "very emotionally evocative covers." Enough said . . .

UP>

UPDATE:  February 16, 2005 9:31pm

What did Carly on magizne covers signify?

NYT:  "No magazine loved her more than Fortune, but its embrace was fickle. "There is no question that Fortune put her on the map" with a 1998 cover article, Carol J. Loomis, Fortune's editor at large, told CNBC on Wednesday, when Ms. Fiorina was ousted. Asked if the cover article in the current issue, which pronounced H-P's Compaq deal a blunder, played a role in the ouster, Ms. Loomis said "I suspect that the article helped," though H-P directors said it did not."

>

Sources:

Fortune_cover_appleTechnology Special
How Big Can Apple Get?

"Back from near oblivion, Apple is setting the pace in a new digital universe where computing and entertainment merge. We asked Steve Jobs how he did it (hint: It's the software, stupid) and what's next."

See also:  Apple's New Mac Mini: A True 21st Century Trojan Horse, Saving Face at Sony and Five questions for Steve Jobs.

See Also:
Carly's Nemesis: Fate or Fortune? 
Katharine Q. Seelye
NYT,  February 13, 2005
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/13/business/yourmoney/13suits.html?

Sunday, February 13, 2005 | 06:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d83470cea269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Uh-Oh: Apple on the Cover of Fortune:

Comments

Magazine covers aside, Apple seems to be on the winning side of consumer's online music preference (Napster's "educational" superbowl ad notwithstanding). Maybe people figure that subscription models are good for Napster's business model but not a good value proposition for consumers:

Buyers said to favour a la carte music in 2005
Napster and co. will have to work much harder if they're to convince music buyers that subscription services are worth the money.

That's the conclusion of research conducted by market watcher Parks Associates. Its Global Digital Living survey reveals that only eight per cent of people who own MP3 players and possess an Internet connection are likely to use a music subscription service this year.

By contrast, around 40 per cent said they are likely to buy songs on a one-off basis.

"Consumers either do not fully grasp the value of a subscription 'all-you-can-eat' service, or they simply don't want it," said Parks research director John Barrett.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/14/music_a_la_carte_vs_subs/

Posted by: Rajesh | Feb 14, 2005 11:33:41 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner