The Psychology/Sentiment of Oil

Tuesday, March 08, 2005 | 06:02 AM

I'll be damned if I can explain exactly how this happened:

Last year, when Oil passed $40 on the way to $55, there was a resounding chorus about prices: Its only temporary, oil cannot stay this high, there was a $10, $15 even $20  terror premium built in.

Recall that The Big Picture repeatedly has disagreed with that sentiment.

Now, suddenly, its all but gone. There is an  eerie recognition from analysts and the media that oil will be pricey for quite a while -- indeed, indefinitely.   

How does that happen? What is the group dynamic, the psychology, that allows such a shift to take place? Perhaps one can only be wrong for so long, continually losing your (or your clients') money in the process until, well, there ain't no more. When the not long and wrong crowd lose all their dough, their megaphones go away (that's merely a guess).

Maybe this helps to explain the shift :

"When the second quarter of last year got under way, analyst forecasts called for energy companies in the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index to earn 3% more than they had a year earlier, according to Thomson First Call. Earnings grew by 62% instead. At the beginning of the third quarter, the analysts expected earnings growth of 16%. They got 56%. In the fourth quarter, earnings grew by 101%, versus the 39% analysts predicted."   - Justin Lahart, Energized, Ahead of the Tape, WSJ
 

My bigger concern is:  Is energy becoming a crowded trade? When does the crowd turn into a mob? As in, when does this newfound appreciation of oil prices become a contrary signal? Jim Cramer mentioned yesterday he was a seller of oil stocks, but IMHO he's  merely making a gut feel trade (also known as a guess). I need a more concrete sell signal before blowing out.

Lastly, here's a WSJ article on the subject of Oil Futures:

Wsj_03072005212506
"As often happens during a crude-oil rally like the one seen in recent weeks, most observers are focusing on the price of oil contracts for immediate delivery, currently at $53.89 a barrel. In an otherwise fragmented global market, this contract provides a standardized benchmark. When professional traders, economists or families chatting about current events at dinner talk about the price of oil, they are all referring to the "front-month" contract.

Yet the market for long-term oil delivery has become more active than usual and is sending its own message: The real danger of a crude-supply pinch is months or years away, but expect a spate of generally high prices for the foreseeable future.

"I used to think, forget it, $40 oil is not sustainable," says Oppenheimer & Co. energy analyst Fadel Gheit, a 30-year industry veteran. "It has to come down from there. That's what I was taught. But things have changed. The center line for oil prices is clearly moving up."



>

UPDATE:
With this post, I am adding a new category:  Psychology/Sentiment. I reference it enough, and thought it worthwhile to explore the subject as a stand alone topic.

>

Sources:
Energized
Ahead Of The Tape
Justin Lahart
WSJ, March 8, 2005; Page C1
http://online.wsj.com/article/1,,SB111022698887472539,00.htm

Message From the Futures: High Oil Prices to Stick Around
By PETER A. MCKAY
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, March 8, 2005; Page C1
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB111021882177972367,00.html

Tuesday, March 08, 2005 | 06:02 AM | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d8343d121d53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Psychology/Sentiment of Oil:

Comments

The popularity of oils coupled with the big moves this ytd troubles me as well. I do think Cramer has a good idea in peeling some off, and have done so.

However, I look at the underinvestment for over 20 years; the environmental blocks today; the greater difficulty in getting to new supply technologically... and an 8% SP weighting (vs. 25% 1981)... and I have decided to stay with at least a double mkt weight (down from triple).

J

Posted by: John | Mar 8, 2005 8:19:15 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner