Conundrum Revisited

Thursday, May 26, 2005 | 12:30 PM

There were several things we didn't get to discuss last night regarding the Conundrum discussion.

1.  Demand and Supply issue
Since the 30 year was cancelled, its a simple matter of the supply/demand equation. With less 30 year's  around, the price gets bid up, and the yield lowers. So Bond managers look to the 10 year, yielding only moderately less  4.41 versus 4.07 -- but a third of long a duration.

Why is it that everyone in America – from Businesses to each and every homeowner has refinanced their debt at half century low levels – except for America itself? Who ever decided to cancel the 30 year owes Uncle Sam a big apology.
>

2.  Deflation warning.

Now that we seem to have inflation licked, there’s still that nasty worry about Asia exporting Deflation to the U.S. That will likely be the next battle. Unless we want to ignorethe warning signs -- wage pressure, ever decreasing prices for finished goods, coupled with weak demand -- Deflation remains a genuine concern.
>

3. Its good for China

China has developed the biggest appetite for US treasuries – and Why not? The balance of trade deficit gives them more cash than they know what to do with. Why not buy US Bonds, and keep rates low for finance-loving Chinese-goods purchasing US Consumers? Until they are so stuffed with dollars that they have no where else to put them, and then they can dump them on the open market. While we are dealing with that mess, China then invades Taiwan. You read it here first.
>

4.  Bond Market is foreseeing an economic slowdown in 2006

This is the ugliest component – the Bond market may be foretelling a slowdown into 2006. Watch the market slong enough, and you cannot help but notice that the bond markets are the “adult supervision;” Equities markets, on the other hand, are more akin to a hormone addled teenager.

I'd be interested in hearing any other factors keeping rates low. Post below, and I'll excerpt the best ones here later.

>


For the other side of the argument, see Richard Clarida's WSJ OP-ED, Our Post-Bubble World.

>


Thursday, May 26, 2005 | 12:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (16) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d8347c219369e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Conundrum Revisited:

Comments

Great blog.

Asking as an ignorant investor, what practical effect of the Chinese selling their treasury debt on the open market have on the economy, the equity markets and the bond markets? What's the risk here?

Posted by: royce | May 26, 2005 1:18:04 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner