Impact of Fed on Short-term Trading
Is there any pattern to trading around the FOMC meeting?
chart courtesy of Michael Panzner
>
Michael Panzner, whose charts have been gracing these pages quite regularly, observes:
Since the Federal Reserve began raising interest rates in the tightening cycle that began on June 30, 2004, the stock market has exhibited a curious short-term bipolarity in reaction to the central bank's actions.
Generally speaking, regardless of which way prices finish up on the day of the hike -- usually higher, though last time around they fell by more than 1% -- they have tended to swing in the opposite direction 24 hours later.
Some might say that these short-term swings are nothing more than noise, casting little light on what is going on in the wake of the central bank's widely-telegraphed strategy of boosting rates back towards more neutral levels.
A cynic might argue, however, that rather than having their anxieties assuaged by Dr. Greenspan's supposedly more investor-friendly and transparent approach, market players remain as confused as ever about where things are -- and where they are headed.
Maybe it's time to change the meds?
Tuesday, May 03, 2005 | 05:30 PM | Permalink
| Comments (1)
| TrackBack (0)
add to de.li.cious |
digg this! |
add to technorati |
email this post
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/763/2390981
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Impact of Fed on Short-term Trading:
Comments
Barry, I'm a fan of Mike Panzer too.
Since 1980, the Naz gained an average 0.53% ten days after an FOMC meeting.
Since 1998, the Naz lost an average of 0.66% within ten days after an FOMC meeting.
Since 1980, 124 of 203 times, or 61.08% of the time the Naz closes higher on FOMC meeting days.
Since 1980, the Naz's average gain on FOMC meeting days is 0.20%.
And yes, the average's show that the day following the FOMC meeting, the Naz is down.
Posted by: The Nattering Naybob | May 4, 2005 12:15:30 AM





























