Beware of Hedonic Adjustments to NFP!

Friday, May 06, 2005 | 06:07 PM

I was as taken aback by today's Non-Farm Payroll number as anyone. But I was curious as to this huge number could be such a surprising outlier, given all the wekaness we have been seeing.

Then, I dug beneath the headlines a bit, and discovered this small little hedonic adjustment to the NFP data:  The CES Net Birth/Death Model.

BLS notes " There is an unavoidable lag between an establishment opening for business and its appearing on the sample frame and being available for sampling. Because new firm births generate a portion of employment growth each month, non-sampling methods must be used to estimate this growth." In other words, they estimate the number of jobs created by new firms which the BLS has yet to sample.

Now, I have no idea how accurate or reliable this adjsutment actually is. But out of today's headline NFP data, out of those 274k jobs, there was a +257k "Birth/Death" adjustment. Of the reported data, 93.8% of the gains have been hedonically adjusted. Note that this is a relatively new process, first introduced in 2000.

I did take the Under, so perhaps I am just "talking my bet." But if anyone can explain this mnore thoroughly to me, I'd greatly appreciate it  . . .

 

UPDATE MAY 7, 2004: 6:02am
Calculated Risk has a very thorough explanation as to the impact of this hedonic adjustment: 

He exhorts us not to mix: "seasonally adjusted numbers with "not seasonally" adjusted numbers. The actual BLS reported jobs created in April was 1.179 Million (before seasonal adjustment). Of these 1.179 million jobs, 257K came from the birth/death model (or about 22%).

If you follow the link to the birth/death model you will see:

"Note that the the net birth/death figures are not seasonally adjusted, and are applied to not seasonally adjusted monthly employment links to determine the final estimate.

"Finally, when the 1.179 Million jobs is seasonally adjusted you get 274 Thousand headline number.

This suggests that the impactof this hedonic adjustment is far less than initially implied.

>

Sources:
CES Birth/Death Model
http://www.bls.gov/web/cesbd.htm

Frequently Asked Questions
http://www.bls.gov/ces/cesbdqa.htm

SEND IN THE CLOWNS   
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/kirby/2005/0304.html

Beware the Birth/Death Jobs Hedonics
http://www.nypost.com/business/19971.htm

Friday, May 06, 2005 | 06:07 PM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d83478b03269e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Beware of Hedonic Adjustments to NFP!:

Comments

I'm really confused by these numbers - so BLS reported that 1.179m jobs were created in April? I thought the number was 274k? Or is 274k the difference between April and the prior month? Where does this 1.179m jobs number come from? I can't believe that we created 1.2m jobs in a single month...any explaination extremely appreciated.

Posted by: Damian | May 7, 2005 9:41:54 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner