Grokster Decision is meaningless to filesharers

Monday, June 27, 2005 | 11:12 AM
in Film | Music

While people may disagree about the appropriate response to filesharing, its pretty clear to most that if Hollywood embraced and extended P2P, they would have a fantastic distribution and promotion machine at their disposal.

I guess all those file sharers, once they read Souter's decision for the majority, will be so compelled by its legal force and arguments that they will immediately stop swapping.

This decision is meaningless when it comes to P2P behavior, but could have significant ramifications for tech and content companies. A bad decision for yechnology and consumers, a good decision for studios and labels . . .

NOTE:  This now sends this case back to the lower courts for trial

>

Update:  June 27, 2005 1:37pm

What does the Grokster decision mean for Google? They just rolled out Google Video, a search tool that lets you find video on the Web; If you then download what you find, is Google now viacariously liable?
s>

Scrolling News Resources:

MGM v. Grokster (EFF)

Notes on RIAA and MPAA Press Conference

Pro-Grokster press conference

WSJ Grokster Roundtable   

C/NET File Swap round up

Copyfight

Freedom-to-tinker

FTC Staff Workshop Report: Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing Technology [PDF]

Entertainment Industry Wins High Court Piracy Fight

Supreme Court Unanimously Sides With Entertainment Industry In Gokster Case

Court: File-sharing services may be sued

Studios Win Big in Grokster Case

Supreme Court rules against file swapping

 

Monday, June 27, 2005 | 11:12 AM | Permalink | Comments (7) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d83480859969e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Grokster Decision is meaningless to filesharers:

Comments

It's odd that in the same legal system that says gun manufacturers can't be held liable for what people do with their products, a tech company that makes file-sharing software can.

And should I not have downloaded that movie trailer for "War of the Worlds"? You know, the one that's supposed to encourage me to go see the stupid movie....Terrible thing that I downloaded it.....

Posted by: royce | Jun 27, 2005 12:01:34 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner