The Napster Grokster Cooption Business Model

Tuesday, June 28, 2005 | 07:35 AM
in Music

Back in 2003, we lamented the industry's missed opportunity to Coopt Napster into a viable industry business model. The Grokster decision represents another chance at our proposed cooption.

Wanna know how smart the recording industry is? Don't answer, just watch how they respond to the MGM v Grokster.

If industry insiders had any savvy, they would revisit our past Napster Cooption Business Model. Use the technology as a promotional tool. Turn it into a modern, on-demand, web-based radio. Put out low-fi mp3s (96k or so) as way to expose new artists, promote special releases, rarities, etc. whet people's appetites for more content which history teaches us they are willing to pay for.

Jiu Jitsu the concept of piracy into a terrific tool for the industry to track, more precisely than anything else before, what artists and songs are attracting which listeners, and where. Custom tailor tours around it, marketing and advertising campaigns, etc.

Create the holy grail of algorithms:  Use it to roll out new music, artists and content via our clever algorithm that can tell, based upon what you have already downloaded, what you may like, will like and will definitely fall in love with.

Turn the recording industry from an asteroid doomed dinosaur to a warm blooded furry mammal. Coopt the technology. Embrace people's love of digital music. Be smarter business people.

>

<sigh>   Or not . . .

Tuesday, June 28, 2005 | 07:35 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (2)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d83423e4f353ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Napster Grokster Cooption Business Model:

» Barry Ritholtz on the Supreme Court's File Sharing Decisions from BusinessPundit
As soon at the Supreme Court rulings came out, I knew where to look for some good commentary. Barry Ritholtz has repeatedly exposed the incompetence and lack of foresight of music executives. Now he's got several interesting pieces on the... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 28, 2005 8:36:26 AM

» Barry Ritholtz on the Supreme Court's File Sharing Decisions from BusinessPundit
As soon at the Supreme Court rulings came out, I knew where to look for some good commentary. Barry Ritholtz has repeatedly exposed the incompetence and lack of foresight of music executives. Now he's got several interesting pieces on the... [Read More]

Tracked on Jun 28, 2005 8:37:32 AM

Comments

This sums up nicely what would make me spend a lot of money on music again. When Napster was free and I was a thieving juvenile, I spent more money on music than at any other time. I bought it because I wanted the liner notes and a nice clean rip at a higher bit rate. I buy very little comparatively now. Your idea won't happen however until revenues are more seriously impacted at these companies.

Posted by: chooky | Jun 28, 2005 9:10:35 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner