Wages & Inflation: 5 years

Wednesday, July 13, 2005 | 10:09 AM

Earlier this morning, I showed a 20 year chart of inflation, relative to consumer income and purchasing power. It was a surprise to see that since 1985, energy, oil and gasoline didn't even make the top 3.

I asked Michael Panzner what the same chart would look like over 5 years.  He noted "Although earnings have kept pace with reported inflation and the prices of some goods and services over the past five years, the average worker's purchasing power has lost ground in several key areas."

He was nice enough to generate this:

click for larger graphic

Earningscpi5yrs_2

Chart courtesy Michael Panzner, Rabo Securities

This chart is noteworthy for two reasons:  First, the impact of energy is inescapable, as its 2 of the top 4 5 areas where consumers have been losing real purchasing power, i.e, the costs of these goods or services are accellerating faster than earnings.

Second, and perhaps most significantly, this chart shows how much CPI understates actual inflation.

Any time you see a fund manager or eoconomist on CNBC discussing how benign inflation is, you can comfortably file that person away as clueless cheerleader.

>

UPDATE:  July 14, 2005 10:28am

Michael Panzner writes:

The original 20-year chart is accurate (which has housing as the second most "inflated" category), but when I rejigged the data to make you that five-year chart, I decided to drop the "alcohol" category and re-sort the list in ascending order to try and make it look a bit tidier.

Unfortunately, between the two steps, I actually ended up dropping the "housing" data, and inadvertently labeled the "alcohol" ratio as "housing". All the other data in the graph is/was correct.

Perhaps the thought of alcoholic beverages muddled my brain...?

Anyway, attached is the new graph [above] (with the "alcohol" category now included) and housing at the end (where it belongs). It was a silly mistake. Sorry.

No harm done --thanks for the fix -- and kudos to eagle eyed Tim (The mess that Greenspan made) for the catch

Wednesday, July 13, 2005 | 10:09 AM | Permalink | Comments (11) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d83482b4c569e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wages & Inflation: 5 years:

Comments

And the housing bar is fantasy land as it's based on rentals rather than purchases if I remember correctly? Did you talk about how housing artificially depresses CPI due to the rental-based calculation rather than mortgage? Or am I remembering this wrong?

Posted by: Damian | Jul 13, 2005 10:54:26 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner