Changing Influences on Foreign Markets?

Friday, November 11, 2005 | 11:58 AM

Given yesterday's monster $66B Trade Deficit (see chart below), perhaps its time to look at some other factors that might be influencing both US and Foreign Markets.

20051111

Many people's working assumption has been that markets outside the US were closely correlated to the US dollar. Indeed, up until the autumn of 1999, equity markets outside the U.S. loosely tracked moves in the dollar.

Since then, however, they have diverged from the buck, and instead tended to mirror the performance of the S&P 500.

Why?

<spacer>

Changing Influences on Foreign Markets

click for larger chart
Us_foreign

 

This raises several questions, but the one that leaps to my mind first is if overseas markets are tracking the S&P500, then why should investors bother diversifying overseas? There are plenty of other good reasons to do so, but uncorrelated returns to US markets may no longer be one of them.

Michael Panzner notes that it comes down to several factors in no particular order:

1) more U.S. players (hedge funds, broker-dealers) are "exporting" the arbitrage and investment strategies that use in the domestic market to other parts of the world;

2) the growth of the internet and of 24/7 business/financial news coverage, especially over the past five years, means investors all over the world are immediately aware of new developments and market trends occurring elsewhere;

3) the heavier-weighted (i.e., largest cap) stocks in most mature markets tend to be multinationals (think Sony, BP, Deutsche Bank, HSBC, etc.) which trade more in line with each other than with domestic peers, sectors, or indices;

4) expanding global trade has caused some degree of convergence among many leading economies, as well as supply-and-demand patterns for goods such as oil;

5) correlations tend to increase in bear markets (of course, the market has been rallying since 2003, but sentiment-wise, one could argue that what we have now is unlike the bullish euphoria we saw in the last half of the 1990s).

I am sure there are more, but you get the idea.

Friday, November 11, 2005 | 11:58 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/763/3614308

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Changing Influences on Foreign Markets?:

Comments

I think it stands to reason that as cross border trade increases and becomes more & more efficient (via trade agreements, etc), R between developed markets and the SPX will get closer and closer to 1. Investors will need to start owning more emerging market stocks in order to seek lower R.
Clearly, the main caveat is the potential for increased protectionism, which would cause R between developed nations and the SPX to fall again.

Posted by: John Bott | Nov 14, 2005 1:32:47 PM

Post a comment






Fusion



Recent Posts

July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

Favorite Links

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner