Then & Now
Over the past 3½ years markets crawled higher, we have watched the gradual but steady build up of bullish expectations. You can see it most plainly in the 2006 BusinessWeek forecasts. The majority of strategists, technicians and economists are expecting gains for the markets in 2006, ranging from mid-single digits up to as high as 30%.
In the Fall of 2002, you were hard pressed to find such sentiment. As telecom stocks bottomed, and profitable technology stocks sold for less than cash on hand, the Bulls were MIA. Telecom, tech and internet stocks, having so duplicitously betrayed their lovers, were widely despised.
It wasn’t only the sentiment that was different back then: Nearly every metric we track was in a different part of the cycle, and pointing in a different direction. Both the vector and angular momentum were different than at present. Consider each of the following:
Interest Rates: In 2002, bond yields were low and heading lower. Since then, bonds have worked their way lower sending yields considerably higher – and they’re heading even higher still; (See nearby Yield Curve charts);
Inflation: The Fed reflated the economy, but awoke inflation. 3 years ago, prices were stable; the big fear was deflation. Today, prices for goods and services are rising.
Earnings Growth: Year-over-Year earnings were awful in 2002, with easy comparisons, and nowhere to go but up. Today, with comparisons much harder, earnings growth is a the top of its range, and is more likely to decelerate;
Fiscal Policy: The Deficit was modest; Federal taxes, especially those on dividends and capital gains, were being cut. Today, rates are more likely to rise than drop. Taxes at the State and local level have been creeping higher;
Real Estate: was beginning a historic growth spurt with major economic impacts: it created 42% of new private sector jobs, allowed mortgage equity extraction of $2 trillion dollars, and drove massive consumer spending – and GDP. Today, at best RE is cooling down; At worst . . .
Consumer Debt: was problematic, but manageable. Now, the negative savings rate combined with significant increases in mortgage debt are extremely concerning.
Commodities: Oil was under $30 and exerted little drag on consumer spending or transport costs; Industrial Metals were cheap, Gold and Silver were half their present prices.
The macro environment, despite the negative sentiment – or more accurately, in large part, because of it – was far more attractive three years ago than it is today.
Note: This was part of a larger research piece that was emailed to institutional clients on April 11, 2006 at ~10:00am
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Then & Now:
interesting cover story in BusinessWeek... S&P 100 earnings up 213.4%; Share prices up 0.9%! They really don't give a good explanation either, besides increased appetite for risk.
Posted by: todd | Apr 12, 2006 10:45:28 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.