Modern versus '60s or '70s Style Recession

Monday, July 23, 2007 | 08:25 AM

Paul points to this fascinating assessment of the state of the Economy from Larry Haverty, Portfolio manager, Gabelli Global Multimedia Trust via Barron's.

This is the market that just won't quit. Or is it?

Haverty: It is like a mystery play. In Act I of the play, it is very clear the U.S. consumer is in what I would call a 21st-century recession, and that's a recession without the negative economic statistics that you would normally get in a '60s or '70s style recession.

How then do you know there is a recession?

Haverty: We have weak end demand virtually everywhere -- in restaurants, autos, durables and at the low end of the consumer area, with pricing pressure on everything from oil to milk. We are not getting a classic recession, probably due to the fact that inventory management has been so much better than it was 30 years ago, largely due to computers. There aren't the massive cancellations of orders that existed in the classic recessions in the '60s and '70s. I can't tell you the last time I have seen a retailer with seriously excessive inventory. The message from this part of the play is that while the consumer is weak, it has basically put the Fed on hold for the last year and for the foreseeable future, because if the Fed raises interest rates it is going to make the sectors that are weak much weaker, and that is not going to accomplish anything.

The question on my mind is how will just-in-time inventory be impacted by the ongoing housing slowdown? Sure, there's no inventory build and less layoffs necessary -- but that only helps the corporate side more efficiently manage a slowdown -- not avoid one alltogether.

Regardless, I find Haverty's comment's insightful, and like the best observations, obvious in hindsight -- one those "Why didi'nt I think of that?".



>

Source:
Interview With Larry Haverty, Portfolio manager,
Gabelli Global Multimedia Trust

SANDRA WARD
Barron's, JULY 23, 2007
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118472768144069974.html

Monday, July 23, 2007 | 08:25 AM | Permalink | Comments (41) | TrackBack (1)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00e008ddc5128834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Modern versus '60s or '70s Style Recession:

» Durable Goods from The Big Picture
The headline number miss of yesterday's Durable Goods number got some people worried about GDP today. Following May's 2.3% decrease, Durable Goods the headline number of 1.4% for June (1.6% was the consensus). The real concern was not the actual miss, ... [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 27, 2007 7:26:30 AM

Comments

I think the EM's hold the key. How long can they drive growth in the absence of the US consumer? History would say not very long unless its different this time!

Posted by: Shrek | Jul 23, 2007 11:10:13 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner