Retail Follow Up

Friday, July 13, 2007 | 07:22 AM

I am meetings this morning, but I needed to get a quick follow up to yesterday's Retail data.

It was mixed, with a negative bias lurking beneath the headlines. A quick review of who reported better sales and who stunk up the joint very quickly reveals a pattern:

Wal-Mart (WMT), Costco (COST) and BJs (BJ) all reported better than expected retail sales for June. Disappointing retail sales were the soft goods, (i.e,  clothing), and nearly all of the Department stores.

As we noted yesterday, Wal-Mart reported same store sales gains of 2.4% vs. its 1% to 2% forecast. They stated that home goods and apparel sales were  weak but grocery sales surged.

There are two reasons for this. We discussed the FOOD INFLATION factor extensively yesterday. The second element is "retail slumming." Middle class families are now shopping downscale, looking to save some cash. Whole Food (WFMI) shoppers are going to Krogers, who's former clients are going to Target (TGT), whose former customers are now in BJs and CostCo's, whose former clients are going to Wal-Mart.

This is not a sign of strength.

See below for explicit details:

Bloomberg: “The number 1 problem is that traffic is down, that created a bigger problem for department stores, said Richard Hastings, a retail analyst at Smyth-Bernard Sands...” 

CNBC: Howard Davidowitz (http://davidowitzassociates.com/), a retail consultant appeared, just before the NYSE close, and said retailers are in an “absolute collapse.” 

Reuters: Rising energy, food costs test Fed core inflation focus  “Swiftly rising food and energy costs are challenging the Federal Reserve's practice of focusing heavily on core prices in setting monetary policy, but the central bank shows little sign of changing its thinking... ‘It must be obvious to the citizenry of this country that there's... inflation,’ said Steve Axilrod, a former  staff director for monetary and financial policy at the Fed [for Volcker]. ‘One ... definition of inflation is  when the (average shopper) notices it in the grocery store.’”

>

More later . . .

Friday, July 13, 2007 | 07:22 AM | Permalink | Comments (17) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/763/20016360

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Retail Follow Up :

Comments

and davidowitz knows the deal

Posted by: SINGER | Jul 13, 2007 8:04:31 AM

So...it was a BS rally! ;)

Couldn't resist.

Posted by: Sven | Jul 13, 2007 8:22:21 AM

Barry,
Along with the slumming Dollar stores sales are up. Family Dollar June same-store sales up 1.5%
Family Dollar June same-store sales est. up 1.9%
Family Dollar June sales up 4.6% to $646 mln
Dollar Tree same store sales were up as well. Thats a good indication of weakness in the consumer

Posted by: costa | Jul 13, 2007 8:34:45 AM

Moin from Germany,

so much for the "strong numbers" spin...

It´s all about liquidity....


U.S. Retail Sales Fell 0.9% in June; Drop 0.4% Excluding Autos

Posted by: jmf | Jul 13, 2007 8:42:40 AM

Dow Futures settled down a bit after the U.S. Retail numbers came out. Certainly nothing on that front to justify yesterday.

jmf, what does it mean to say, "It's all about the liquidity"? We need to think about the sources, if we care to anticipate consequences.

The dollar and the yen are in a race to the bottom. They still have some buoyancy, so it's a slow affair ... as if watching autumn leaves fall and sink to the bottom of a lake. The gold bugs are all atwitter about the approaching multi-year low in dollar index.

Speaking of autumns, appears we may have a doozy abrewing. I offer that a bullshit rally is the one that occurs right before the bear market. And speaking of buoancy, there are a shit-load of turd stocks popping. Short squeezes never last terribly long, and if they're engineered the goal is to sell on the part of the engineers.

Posted by: Momo Fader | Jul 13, 2007 9:06:55 AM

I've been trying to tell everyone since Mar that the big money was buying. As long as they are buying this market is going up. Last week the combined net long position of all the index futures contracts was the largest in history. You would have to be crazy to stand in front of that train. Wait until the commercials start to sell before shorting this market.

Posted by: Gary | Jul 13, 2007 9:23:23 AM

It's a meltup in everything!

Posted by: welcome to weimerica | Jul 13, 2007 10:06:30 AM

Momo, may I reformat your words to match the yen mood:

"as if watching autumn
leaves fall and sink
to the bottom of a lake"

Posted by: mhm | Jul 13, 2007 10:41:23 AM

mhm: very clever!

Posted by: sn | Jul 13, 2007 10:57:03 AM

Today's lousy retail sales number blows up the theory that yesterday's rally was because retail sales were strong.

Posted by: spongetoddsquarepants | Jul 13, 2007 11:47:50 AM

in an absolute colapse? who said that?

Posted by: ashley | Jul 13, 2007 11:57:21 AM

my FDO puts...
like a slurpee in summer.
It's different this time...

Posted by: brion | Jul 13, 2007 12:48:13 PM

in an absolute colapse? who said that?

Davidowitz, in reference to department store sales.

Posted by: mp | Jul 13, 2007 1:35:36 PM

I don't know where everyone is getting this "WalMart came in better than expected" bullshit. Walmart's sales are in a down cycle, have been all year, and June came in exactly as expected. June's sales ALWAYS bounce. I don't see what the big deal is.

Posted by: mp | Jul 13, 2007 2:01:27 PM

so do we hit 14k today or Monday morning?

And why would anyone worry about Retail Numbers, CPI, Unemployment, Etc....

The market obviously does not care!


Posted by: MarkTX | Jul 13, 2007 2:49:19 PM

Barry, may I suggest that you take a look at this Excel file with embedded graphic? This is something I posted on the retail thread at CR's site and shows that June sales were exactly in line with their cycle. Among other things, it suggests the possibility that WalMart, who should know their own cycle, could have lowered guidance in order to exceed expectations.

http://putstuff.putfile.com/94804/464020

Posted by: mp | Jul 13, 2007 5:19:52 PM

From the Reuters article- "Expectations of higher inflation could lead workers to push harder for compensating wage gains and businesses to try harder to raise selling prices -- a classic wage-price spiral."

Allow me to correct it- Expectations of higher inflation could lead workers to push harder for compensating wage gains and businesses to try harder to offshore those jobs or lobby Congress to jack up H1B visa limits -- a classic wage suppression/ inflation masking formula. (And ta-da another batch of jobs that Americans suddenly "won't do.")

Posted by: Aaron Byrnes | Jul 14, 2007 3:04:28 PM

Post a comment






Fusion



Recent Posts

July 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

Favorite Links

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner