Google Proximity: Informational Distance Between Cities
Fascinating infographic showing the "Google-Platonic: distances between cities.
It measures the intensity of relations -- interconnections, information, transactions -- between metropolitan areas.
It works by comparing the number of pages from different cities that appear close to each other online, with the number of pages that are isolated -- the "Google proximity" of differing Cities
Pretty damned cool:
Asia
USA & Europe, Polar View
Friday, June 13, 2008 | 12:30 PM | Permalink
| Comments (13)
| TrackBack (0)
add to de.li.cious | 
digg this! | 
add to technorati | 
email this post
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00e5534fa75a8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google Proximity: Informational Distance Between Cities:
Comments
If we exchange information fast enough, will we be able to turn back time like Superman?!
Posted by: Michael F. Martin | Jun 13, 2008 1:03:09 PM
It's as if Asian countries do not communicate with each other in a robust way.
Posted by: Fritz S | Jun 13, 2008 1:09:50 PM
So maybe the thick line is New York or London.
Posted by: estaban | Jun 13, 2008 1:18:57 PM
This is actually a phenomenon that has been studied in geography for some time. Populations and distance function similar to mass and distance in physics.
This is a pretty cool representation.
Posted by: Caleb Mardini | Jun 13, 2008 1:19:03 PM
Wow! Chicago and Los Angeles don't exist. (Maybe they are missing a few locations.)
Posted by: Lord | Jun 13, 2008 1:29:43 PM
It's pretty, but damn could they use some cartographic guidance. The varying intensity of the relationships would be much more apparent if they varied the color (either hue or saturation) of the lines rather than the thickness. And what does the height of the arcs represent? Is that random or does it mean something?
Posted by: mappo | Jun 13, 2008 1:49:06 PM
this website is pure genius.
Posted by: Giovannoni | Jun 13, 2008 2:44:17 PM
Looks like it's still all about New York & London
Posted by: Sinomania! | Jun 13, 2008 2:45:40 PM
The following is a Super-secret chart that I got from the Commodore 64 internet department. It shows how there are connections between stuff.
....New York----------------- Shanghai---------- Waukegan, IL
...... xx................................xXx............................... xXXx........
....... \.............................. /....\................................ /............
..........\............................ /......\.............................. /.............
...........\ ......Paris............/........ \........Mumbai --- Notting Hill
............\.......xxx --------LAX Airport--------xx........../..............
.............\......./............./.............\............./..\......../..............
..............\...../............ /...............\.........../....\....../...............
......Ft. lauderdale...Hong Kong......\........./......\..../...............
...............xxx...........xXx.........The KMart on ....\../...............
.................................................. Route 14 .... Kevin Bacon
...................................................... xXx ..............xxxXx........
Chart porn! Yeah!
Posted by: jmay | Jun 13, 2008 3:02:45 PM
It looks cool but it violates just about every rule of Tufte regarding visual representation of information. When you are looking at one side of the globe it's hard to tell where the lines connect on the other side. Classic chartjunk...
Posted by: Konrad | Jun 13, 2008 4:14:43 PM
Wow! Chicago and Los Angeles don't exist. (Maybe they are missing a few locations.)
Posted by: Lord | Jun 13, 2008 1:29:43 PM
Then there is Iceland - a red dot with NOTHING coming out... whattsup with that?
Posted by: dryfly | Jun 13, 2008 5:59:27 PM
Caleb Mardini | Jun 13, 2008 1:19:03 PM
--what about sillycon valley?
Posted by: schaz | Jun 13, 2008 10:09:03 PM
Wow, that's a pretty useless graphic. Wouldn't it have made more sense if the lines connecting cities ran along the earth's surface, ideally on a flat projection instead of a sphere, so we could see which cities were linked to which other cities without having to get the screen all gummy by tracing the lines?
Posted by: Kaleberg | Jun 13, 2008 11:20:49 PM
