Capitulation? The Evidence is Decidely Mixed
It looks like we have mixed evidence as to whether last week represented a Capitulatory low. My best guess is that last week will be an intermediate, though not final, low mark.
In the plus column, we have:
-Record levels of Short Interest;
-VIX spiked up over 30 (this has not been a good entry in the past);
-Merrill Lynch survey shows Fund managers running very high cash levels
-1,304 new lows on the NYSE, we saw (a record high).
-The Selling stampede lasted 39 days -- unusually long
-AAII Bullish Index dropped below 25 again
-A short term peak in blog traffic
In the minus column, we have:
-Volume picked up, but didn't match the levels seen in January or March lows;
-Bottom callers are out in full force (that's rarely seen at ultimate lows)
-Merrill survey have showed high cash levels in January, February (and here) and March and June; As often as not, stocks went lower;
-VIX at 30 may be good for a bounce, but it is far below true panic lows of the past;
-A majority of economists believe the US will avoid a recession (why are they always the last to know?);
-Confidence levels dropped significantly, but not to prior extremes (see chart below).
Not quite down to the lows seen in October 2002 or March 2003, when the Nasdaq was off 78% . . .
Thanks, Ron!
>
UPDATE: July 21, 2008 2:15pm
Several people have written in to note that the Barron's chart seems to be understated in past major events -- 1973, 1982, 1987, etc. I do not know why -- or if the chart has been changed over time -- but I will inquire.
Monday, July 21, 2008 | 11:15 AM | Permalink
| Comments (38)
| TrackBack (0)
add to de.li.cious | 
digg this! | 
add to technorati | 
email this post
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00e553ae2cae8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Capitulation? The Evidence is Decidely Mixed:
Comments
I'd hardly call record levels of short interest (highly debatable IMO...what exactly is your source on that?) a PLUS for the market. However this is not the first place I've seen that being used as a reason to jump in. Your bias is too apparent now BR...
Ciao
MS
~~~
BR: Biased?
High SI is often a net positive, providing a floor under stocks; Squeeze can lead to rallies.
I am not sure I understand your comments.
Posted by: michael schumacher | Jul 21, 2008 11:30:47 AM
Definitely not the final low.
Posted by: DL | Jul 21, 2008 11:50:04 AM
Does anyone else view last week (Wed-Fri) as nothing more than the market blowing out all the put option holders right before expiration? I was WAY in the money on about ten different securities - the sellers of those contracts were going to be slaughtered if they expired at Tuesday's levels.
Manipulation, just in time for option expiration. Nothing more. That's my take.
Posted by: CPJ | Jul 21, 2008 12:07:33 PM
For most of the reasons you mention, not all, your short interest premise is iffy as others suggest, I agree this is likely not the true bottom. Much important than these, some of which are symptoms rather than disease, are the fundamentals. Consumer spending and just as important allocation, the budget deficit, employment and profit outlooks, all stink. Were in the first six months of what looks like a rather nasty period. That said we're probably not going to see another traumatic slip either. The Dow bottom is at worst mid tens I'd have thought. That at least is the scenario I'm assuming for my own investment plans.
Posted by: John | Jul 21, 2008 12:12:15 PM
Bloomberg reporting Lehman's chief global strategist just cut his year end number for the S&P to 1450. Now that's what I call capitulation!
Posted by: Scott Frew | Jul 21, 2008 12:14:18 PM
1. Short Interest - the short interest I look at on QQQQ and its top names (GOOG, AAPL, RIMM, MSFT) are at levels I call laughable...short ratios one and lower. Maybe I'm too narrow focused, but that's the market I play in. I find it hard to believe the broad market has bottomed with these high profile, high risk stocks so complacent.
2. I'll post my customized put/call chart. Market doesn't bottom until 10 day MA is 1.25 or higher after a downturn like this...and today's move makes that day even further away. It is actually more likely we have now seen a top than a bottom.
3. Nobody here ever talks about the commitment of traders report...it shows that in equity index options and futures, the dumb money is long, not short.
4. VIX must soar over 50% to reach recent highs of fear.
Posted by: Steve Barry | Jul 21, 2008 12:16:27 PM
For what its worth, my call for an inflection point (not even a bottom) is when corporate default rates reach 10% and the CDS market holds up. Until default rates reach 8-10% we'll continue in a downward spiral with occasional short-lived rallies. If the CDS market does not hold up in the face of 8-10% default rates, then we are talking armageddon time.
Posted by: Eric | Jul 21, 2008 12:18:14 PM
Caveat:
There was no link to the short interest in the original post put up this morning.
Didn't think I'd catch that did ya??
Minyanville???? Come on at least link a short interest site or the put/call ratio....
~~~
BR: That was a typepad glitch that was fixed immediately.
You seem to see nefarious intent everywhere dude . . . switch to decaf!
Posted by: michael schumacher | Jul 21, 2008 12:23:39 PM
If you think the confidence index is bad now, just wait til people figure out that this isn't 2003. There is almost nothing comparable about the geo-political situation, the US government financial situation, the US economy in general, or the larger world economy between then and now.
Posted by: VoiceFromTheWilderness | Jul 21, 2008 12:25:24 PM
MS,
Here...look at these short ratios...use the dropdown list to see QQQQ and the names that inspire animal spirit. There is no fear there...no short squeezes to come...no pent-up buying power.
Posted by: Steve Barry | Jul 21, 2008 12:34:23 PM
For this to be the low, bank losses would have to stop (not moderate, STOP), and the consumer would have to restart their buying binge.
Yeah, that'll happen.
S&P 500 went above 20 day MA today for the first time in months.
If it can stay there, maybe, just maybe, this rally will outlast the week. My money is literally betting against that. But the rally is barely holding on today.
Posted by: Jim D | Jul 21, 2008 12:42:10 PM
SB-
That was my point...it's virtually a non-event. I laughed when last week's "rally" was so easily put down to short covering. Some of it was but indexes DO NOT stay at high's (thus creating new ones on the minute it seemed) by just shorts covering. The lack of any substantial post from our host here regarding the various other activities that ALSO contributed (much more IMO) to that just screams out (at least at me it does).
I guess if you "called the bottom" it makes for an easily digestible reason as long as you don't do any research.
Ciao
MS
Posted by: michael schumacher | Jul 21, 2008 12:51:47 PM
Was the record high short interest in 1929 a plus for the market?
Posted by: Eric Sebille | Jul 21, 2008 1:01:47 PM
I have been know to complain about CNBC cheerleading for sometime...this Sue Herrera treats the market like it was her own small child..."oh look what market did today."
Today offers further proof...Dow is now 35 points off its low of today and 93 points off its highs. How does Sue call it?..."market well off its lows." It is insane already.
Posted by: Steve Barry | Jul 21, 2008 1:03:34 PM
Since 2000 at least, or maybe 1998, it seems that virtually all the US markets have had extremely ragged edges in both time and play and I see no reason a capitulation should be any different; I'm starting to think of the noughts as the dubyas (yeah, yeah, so sue me).
Posted by: RW | Jul 21, 2008 1:11:23 PM
Until the Fed revises its growth forecast for 2009 and I see at least one quarter of negative growth, I'm assuming optimism is irrationally high.
I cannot not understand the reasoning, much less agree with the viewpoint, that the US isn't going to have its 'economy' shrink. The national statistics don't reflect my observations in CA. I think CA must be both worse off and ahead of the curve. Tight credit is still only just beginning to force companies out of business and force more layoffs.
It is the effect of the layoffs that will send us negative.
And I just don't see enough people admitting that 2009 is going to be just as bad, if not worse, than 2008. My guess is the market will foreshadow that change in viewpoint and the DOW will be 20% lower than these past lows.
That said - watch the market rally on July 31 when the GDP number for Q2 comes in at 2%+.
Posted by: jdd | Jul 21, 2008 1:31:48 PM
learning about chart reading and read some tech analysis blogs. looked at some charts this weekend and it does look like an intermediate low for a few months at least. maybe even the real bottom of this bear market.
Posted by: dba | Jul 21, 2008 1:35:11 PM
"BR: That was a typepad glitch that was fixed immediately."
A glitch......ok. As in the movie "office space" I'm sure.
"You seem to see nefarious intent everywhere dude . . . switch to decaf!"
Nothing nefarious BR....just hate when people get sloppy. Short interest is a non-event and you know it. It's too bad you can't or won't see that FWIW.
Ciao
MS
~~~
BR: It was one of the factors on THAT side of the ledger. I tried to list as many as I could think of, pro & con.
But you are missing the big picture, and thats whether or not this is a capitulatory low. I thought I made that clear in the 2nd sentence.
Don't miss the forest for the trees . . .
Posted by: michael schumacher | Jul 21, 2008 1:35:38 PM
Capitulation?
Wait until investors need to dip into their investment portfolios to support their lifestyle.
Posted by: D. | Jul 21, 2008 1:51:14 PM
jdd:
I'm with you. The fundamentals stink, and this recession has only just started. For some reason this market seems more irrational than I've ever seen it in 40 years, jumps on the most scanty of evidence or contrarian evidence etc. Basically I put it down to the fact that a clear majority of trading is now programmed bank and hedge fund activity. Stanley Kubrick was onto something.
Posted by: John | Jul 21, 2008 1:51:33 PM
My take is that we won't see the final low until after Obama takes office.
Posted by: DL | Jul 21, 2008 1:56:26 PM
Probably 'a' low, but not 'the' low. I have noticed an abnormally large number of people calling a bottom. Maybe I'm just more tuned in. I did notice on the two big up days last week there were come talking heads suggesting this was a bear trap which makes me think its not...
Posted by: Robert | Jul 21, 2008 1:56:54 PM
I confess to being in the "no bottom yet" crowd. The dismal prospects stretching out before us for as far as the eye can see -- debts, deficits, dollar debacle, housing debacle, banking debacle, strapped consumers, and no champions in evidence for any course of action that would alter things -- lead me to believe that eventually the believers in "the bottom is behind us" will realize that there is no pony in this mess, it's crap all the way down.
The question is, how long will it take the ebullient among us to come to this realization? That will be the point that we can have a real capitulation of terror, when everyone throws up their hands and expects the end of western civilization, or at least their own comfy lifestyles.
I doubt that it will be anytime soon. The impending election will keep the sheeple distracted, and the PPT will keep intervening to prolong the illusion of sound markets and safety. Possibly the continued stream of horrible skeletons and revelations emerging from the crippled financial companies will do the trick, but I doubt it, what with Uncle Ben showering any and all with free (and increasingly worthless) money.
After the next administration takes office (whichever one it is), and is forced to deal with the realities of their situation, then we might see some straight talk and actions designed to slow the rise in debt and inflation (hey, I'm an optimist), as they know that without some sort of change, they won't make it to the end of their term without a catastrophe (a President McCain might have been persuaded otherwise by Phil Gramm, but "doctor" Gramm has already shot his own feet off and is no longer a factor (except for possible criminal prosecution and blame-scaping)).
That leaves me with an uncomfortably large interval in which the direction is uncertain and can change at a moment's notice. Yuck.
Posted by: constantnormal | Jul 21, 2008 2:03:58 PM
BR,
Thanks for the evidence and links for both sides. This type of balanced information is value added and I appreciate your assessment as well. Very hard to see this being the ultimate low, but maybe I am selling financial engineering short...
Posted by: JS | Jul 21, 2008 2:05:57 PM
The leading economic indicators today indicated a decrease in the money supply...where can I go to find how this has been trending...?
thanks in advance
Bruce in Tennessee
Posted by: Bruce | Jul 21, 2008 2:10:00 PM
