Tuesday, July 27, 2004
WMD & The George Costanza defense
I'm watching Bill O'Reilly interview Michael Moore (?!) on Fox right now at the convention. The issue is whether President Bush "lied" to the American people when he claimed that Iraq had WMD, or whether he was merely "misinformed."
We won't get into all the reasons why this is such a gross over simplification of a very complex, multi-faceted issue -- instead, I will just cut right to the chase, and quote O'Reilly. He actually says to Moore:
"Its not a lie if you believe it."
Life imitating art: O'Reilly has just given the President the George Costanza defense for the missing WMD.
As George would say, "Do you ever just get down on your knees and thank God that you know me and have access to my dementia?"
Posted at 08:56 PM in Humor, Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Bob Hope: May 29, 1903 - July 27, 2003
Great collection of Bob Hope quotes:
ON TURNING 70 "You still chase women, but only downhill."
ON TURNING 80 "That's the time of your life when even your birthday suit
needs pressing."
ON TURNING 90 "You know you're getting old when the candles cost more than
the cake."
ON TURNING 100 "I don't feel old. In fact I don't feel anything until
noon. Then it's time for my nap."
ON GIVING UP HIS EARLY CAREER, BOXING "I ruined my hands in the ring ...
the referee kept stepping on them."
ON GOLF "Golf is my profession. Show business is just to pay the green
fees."
ON PRESIDENTS "I have performed for 12 presidents and entertained only
six."
ON RECEIVING THE CONGRESSIONAL GOLD MEDAL "I feel very humble, but I think
I have the strength of character to fight it."
ON HIS FAMILY'S EARLY POVERTY "Four of us slept in the one bed. When it
got cold, mother threw on another brother."
ON HIS SIX BROTHERS "That's how I learned to dance. Waiting for the
bathroom."
ON HIS EARLY FAILURES "I would not have had anything to eat if it wasn't
for the stuff the audience threw at me."
-Bob Hope: May 29, 1903 - July 27, 2003
Source: Quotes of the Day,
(rheamo@centurytel.net
subject=Subscribe_Quotes_of_the_Day)
Posted at 07:34 PM in Humor | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Sunday, July 25, 2004
LEDs to replace light bulbs
Pretty cool idea: A recent advance in light-emitting diodes may illuminate the path to replacing light bulbs with LEDs within the next five years, according to researchers. Fred Schubert, a professor at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (Troy, N.Y.), claims to have invented a 99-percent efficient reflector that promises to speed the replacement of light bulbs with LEDs:
"Until now, all lighting systems, especially incandescent bulbs, generated more heat than light. But our 99-percent efficient reflectors for LEDs makes them the first candidate for light-bulb replacement that generates more light than heat," said Schubert.25% of U.S. electrical consumption is for lighting. Wow. That's a potentially huge oil/coal/nuclear power saver . . .By tipping the scales towards more light than heat, Schubert said, there's also light at the end of the tunnel. He envisions white LEDs beginning to replace incandescent light bulbs within five years. Schubert has so far only demonstrated his omnidirectional reflector LEDs in red and blue, achieving more than twice the brightness of earlier LEDs. The next step is to demonstrate white LEDs for light- bulb replacement."
Source:
Bright idea: LEDs poised to replace light bulbs
R. Colin Johnson
EE Times, July 23, 2004 (1:00 PM EDT)
http://www.eetimes.com/at/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=25600144
Posted at 07:54 AM in Science | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Saturday, July 24, 2004
Banned Music

Banned Music.org is a peer-to-peer collaboration that makes it impossible for the major record labels to ban or censor musical works. When record labels send legal threats to musicians, record stores, or websites, we will post the music here for download and publicize the censorship attempt. There is a clear fair use right to distribute this music, and for the public to decide whether current copyright law is serving musicians and the public, they need to be able to hear what's being suppressed.
via Trubble.com
Posted at 06:44 AM in Music | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Friday, July 23, 2004
The Truth About Cars: RX8
The Truth About Cars is one of those terrific websites that have yet to be found by the mainstream press. Put out by a pair of freelance automotive journalists -- Robert Farago and Chris Paukert -- its heavy on reviews, and light on filler.
I particularly liked their recent review of the RX8:
"Imagine you’re zizzing along in third gear, waiting for an opportunity to put pedal to metal. The instant you floor it, the RX8’s tacho needle begins an Olympic sprint around the dial straight to - hold on, is that really 9000rpms? “Nine”, as in one before “ten”? After a few seconds spent listening to the binging rev limiter, you look down at the speedo and discover you’re doing over 80mph, with three more gears available for your dining and dancing pleasure. All of which offer identical levels of blender-smooth grunt and go.Slot the flyweight gearbox into fourth, fifth or sixth. Guide the RX8 into a bend. Notice that the turn-in is quick, crisp and accurate. As you seek out the apex of the turn, the RX8’s perfectly-balanced chassis adjusts to your throttle and helm inputs both intimately and infinitely. You can change your attitude mid-corner without life-threatening repercussions."

Source: The Truth About Cars
Posted at 07:06 AM in Design | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Wednesday, July 21, 2004
Arrested Development
Television Critics Association embraced my favorite new sitcom, Fox's low-rated social satire "Arrested Development," giving it the award for outstanding comedy and best new program.
I find the show hysterical, and I'm dumbfounded that so few people watch it -- the characters are amusing, the writing is brilliantly sharp
The show virtually owes its survival to the support of critics, who lobbied all season for its return and were rewarded when Fox announced it would bring the show back this fall in the post-"Simpsons" slot at 8:30 Sundays.
You should catch as many of the summer reruns as you can. They are brilliantly subversive.
Oh, and the TCA presented a real journalism award, to Jon Stewart and the Daily Show: "Only television critics, for instance, would have conferred this year's prize for outstanding news and information programming to Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" — vaulting it over rivals like PBS' "Frontline" and ABC's "Nightline."
It was a decision made on both merit and message. As my cross-town rival, Melanie McFarland of the Post-Intelligencer, said when presenting the award, at a time when the mainstream media seem cowed, Jon Stewart and company embody "a core of truth."
Source:
TV critics vote for merit, message
Kay McFadden / Times staff columnist
Seattle Times, July 21 2004
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/artsentertainment/2001983225_kay20.html
Posted at 10:07 PM in Television | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Tuesday, July 20, 2004
MP3 Aggregator
MP3 Aggregator . . . http://www.mp3blogs.org/
An aggregated feed of mp3 weblogs: updated every hour on the hour. Read online or via the RSS feed. Never miss a link to your new favourite tune again.
Posted at 11:52 AM in Music | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Monday, July 19, 2004
Subject Change
Tom Toles always seems to capture the heart of the moment in politics just so:

via Yahoo!
Posted at 06:08 AM in Humor, Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Amazon.com Knee-Jerk Contrarian Game!
Here's a fun game... First, look up the most popular and critically-acclaimed books, movies, and music on Amazon. Click on "Customer Reviews," and sort them by "Lowest Rating First." Hilarity ensues! It's the Amazon.com Knee-Jerk Contrarian Game!
Post your own favorites in the comments!
Here's a fun game... First, look up the most popular and critically-acclaimed books, movies, and music on Amazon. Click on "Customer Reviews," and sort them by "Lowest Rating First." Hilarity ensues! It's the Amazon.com Knee-Jerk Contrarian Game!
via Waxy
Miles Davis, "Kind of Blue" "This is one of the worst albums I've ever bought. It's so boring and lifeless. Good to fall asleep to." "its boredom,nostalgia and scarcely concealed contempt make it the perfect background music for this narcissistic age of ours." "I found Mr. Davis' playing to be laughable at best. Finally, it's irritating; and confusing that so many people laud it." Abbey Road I bought this album because I totally thought the guy on the right was Kate Hudson's husband. So I mean, I THOUGHT I was scoring some QUALITY stoner grooves or like, something kinda White Stripey.There are 100s of reviews, and some are utterly hysterical . . .Dude, was I wrong.
Like, are there ANY phat beats on this thing? Um, NO--I heard they don't tour at all--I bet they can't dance, 'cause not one of their boy band harmonies has a kickin' beat behind it, so what's the point?
And what's with the look? I mean, dude, hit a gymn already, and like, catch Queer Eye like even once, and get some product in your hair.
And those lyrics...they don't take it from the streets to the suburbs (props to Eminem) or the suburbs to the suburbs (shout out to tha Kid)--in fact THEY DON'T RAP AT ALL. I Want You (She's So Heavy)--I mean, sure we all want the hot girl, but do you have to make the other girl who's fat feel bad by telling her that? Too cold. And what's with Carry That Weight--is the guy going with the fat girl after all, or has he gotten fat himself? Confusing. Give Me "your body is a wonderland" any day.
Speaking of heavy, forget slammin' tracks--these guys are ENGLISH, so they don't hit it like like Korn or Limp Bizkit or Phantom Planet. And okay, yeah, Sun King was kind of cool to chill to, but it would be better if it lasted like, twenty minutes with the same downbeats going all the way through--you can't get halfway through your doobie before the song is like, over. And Polythene Pam right after? Freaked me out, man.
So, in summary, check out a real band like Incubus.
posted by par on July 2, 2004 12:20 AM
Posted at 05:09 AM in Books, Film, Humor, Music | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Sunday, July 18, 2004
Columbia photo of North Atlantic
The photograph below was taken by the crew on board the Columbia during its last mission, on a cloudless day.
The picture is of Europe and Africa when the sun is setting. Half of the picture is in night. The bright dots you see are the cities lights. The top part of Africa is the Sahara Desert. Note that the lights are already on in Holland, Paris, and Barcelona, and that's it's still daylight in Dublin, London, Lisbon, and Madrid.
The sun is still shining on the Strait of Gibraltar. The Mediterranean Sea is already in darkness. In the middle of the Atlantic Ocean you can see the Azores Islands; below them to the right are the Madeira Islands; a bit below are the Canary Islands; and further South, close to the farthest western point of Africa, are the Cape Verde islands.
Note that the Sahara is huge and can be seen clearly both during Daytime and night time.
To the left, on top, is Greenland, totally frozen.
click for larger chart
![]()
Source: Graphic Humor & Inspiration (ghi@lists.tagnet.org)
>
UPDATE: August 30, 2005 7:31am
Turns out this was not taken by the Columbia crew:
"The photograph included in this mailing predates the Columbia shuttle disaster by quite some time. As we found with the World Trade Center attacks of 2001, even the most nondescript of chain letters seems somewhat more "special" when associated with a national tragedy. Fortunately, this one appears to be a hopeful misattribution and not an intentionally misleading hoax (like another chain, supposedly including a series of photographs of the Columbia's destruction)."
Posted at 05:50 AM in Art & Design, Science | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBack
Saturday, July 17, 2004
What is "The cult of Ken Jennings" for $100
In true Jeopardy fashion,
kottke poses an question: What if the reigning Jeopardy champ, Ken Jennings. never loses?
Here's an excerpt:
"[What if] Jennings is still the reigning champion and remains champion for years to come? The nerdy Mormon's appearance on television will become a part of normal life in America. Lincoln's on the $5 bill. Sun rises in the east, sets in the west. Michael Bay's movies suck. Ken Jennings is the Jeopardy champ. There are now three constants in life: death, taxes, and Ken Jennings.Go read the rest of it . . .In short order, the ratings of the now-live show go through the roof, singlehandedly propping up the dying network television networks. To placate the increasingly vocal anti-Jennings contingent of viewers, the producers start throwing all sorts of special contestants at him. Harvard professors, Disney Imagineers, Rhodes Scholars, a 10 yo genius from South Korea, Danny Hillis, David Foster Wallace, Edward Witten, and even Ben Stein. Jennings defeats them easily, deciding the games well before Final Jeopardy, much to the glee of Jennings' burgeoning fan club.
Jennings, now making hundreds of millions of dollars in endorsements (he's under exclusive contract to Nike, promoting their sportswear geared toward the "intellectual athlete") protests when -- starting in early 2009 -- contestants are allowed to use Google's new S4 (Synaptic Semantic Search System) interface during the show to research answers, but still defeats all challengers. In 2012, the first contestants sporting genetically enhanced "buzzer thumbs" appear on the program. In 2013, the first computer systems to pass the Turing test are allowed as contestants. Jennings handles them all, au naturel.
Inevitably, a Jennings-based religion springs up. A young Mormon living a few blocks from the studio where Jeopardy tapes, reveals he has recently discovered a previously unknown book of the Old Testament. The lost book, coincidentally entitled "Trebek", tells of a living God from "the land of salt, jazz, and many wifes Who shall smite His enemies with a magical rod and infinite wisdom for the amusement of His followers" and promises salvation and everlasting life for whosoever believeth in him. After the new religion's leader appears on Oprah, the Church of Jennings becomes the fastest growing religion in the world.
Posted at 07:50 AM in Humor | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Friday, July 16, 2004
Dennis Miller: Still Not funny
I think I read a variation of that statement -- Dennis Miller is not funny -- a dozen times or so this week:
Ironically, as Matt Stoller observed:
"Yes, honest discussion would be a major step forward. It would be THE major step forward. This lack of an effective and honest analytical framework for modern politics is underlying the political success of The Daily Show and The Onion. Comedians can call what's going on fraudulent and crazy, because like with bloggers there's no pretense of balance. I have always had tremendous respect for comedians, because you can't fake funny.Back to Miller -- he stopped being funny a long time ago. While there's humor in popping the bubble of sanctimony and pomposity of those in power; It can hardly be called edgy comedy to defend the "Powers that be." There's little funny to be found in the blind defence of poorly thought out policies executed miserably. Where's the humor in that?It's interesting that SNL's failure to seize the political moment is palpable, whereas The Daily Show is attracting top political talent as guests. I also think that Jon Stewart is doing better interviews than anyone on TV. Stewart is not nasty to anyone - he's nice, inquisitive, and he always gives his guests the benefit of the doubt. But he doesn't tolerate bullshit, and he doesn't talk down to his audience. In fact, he's a lot less cynical than the journalists he interviews - he expects quality from our politics and media, and is still disappointed when he doesn't get it. How refreshing."
I wonder why no one has tried Google bombing the phrase "not funny" to Dennis Miller (Maybe its because he doesn't have a permanent home page).
Let me suggest this parody site: http://www.whitehouse.org/ask/dmiller.asp
Bomb away!
Posted at 06:40 AM in Humor, Politics | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
U.S. Grammar School Interim Report to Parents
A very funny piece of satire, attributed to Nancy Greggs of The Guardian-UK, 5/25/04 (I could only find it via topplebush)
Dear Mr. and Mrs. G.H.W. Bush,Once again, it is that time of year when we update the parents of our students on their child's progress, and we regret to inform you that your son, Georgie, is not doing as well as we'd hoped and expected when he embarked on his four-year program at our school.
As you are well aware, Georgie was installed as class president at the start of the school year, despite the fact that the majority of his fellow students did not vote for him. We foresaw problems immediately, but were assured by several school board members (who, as we understand it, are friends of your family) that this would not result in any real difficulty. Unfortunately, they have been proven wrong.
In the area of scholastic achievement, despite our best efforts, Georgie is still reading and speaking at a grade level far below our usual standards.. At this point, we are not sure if his failure to learn is due to laziness and a lack of ability to apply himself to his studies, or if he simply lacks the intellectual capacity to improve in these areas.
His oral presentations to the class are particularly troubling; it is apparent that Georgie has not read the necessary materials, and he often simply fabricates facts to hide this shortcoming. In oral exams, he tends to repeat the same answers over and over, e.g. "The economy is good; jobs are on their way," indicating a profound failure to keep up with the Current Events portion of the curriculum.Georgie also tends to fabricate elaborate stories about himself - which, admittedly, can sometimes be very amusing. During a school celebration last May, he delighted his fellow students by coming to class in a little "flight suit" (just like the grown-ups wear!), and had everyone in stitches with his story about the family dog having eaten his report card from military pre-school!
On the whole, however, Georgie does not play well with other children. His "leadership" in the classroom continues to divide many students, one against the other. Other study groups, such as our French and German-language classes, are no longer willing to cooperate with Georgie's group, even though they have traditionally done so in the past.
Your son also displays a lack of taking responsibility for his failings, and seems unable to appreciate the consequences of his actions. Although he was provided with the best textbooks on the subjects of the Economy, Job Creation, The Environment, et cetera, these books were damaged or completely destroyed within a matter of months. Georgie insists that he "inherited" these books in poor condition, despite all evidence to the contrary. (In fact, these same textbooks were previously used by one of our very best students, who actually returned them in better condition than he found them!)
During his first few weeks with us, Georgie quickly became part of a group of other "problem students." Despite warnings, he has consistently befriended children whom we consider to be "bad elements," such as Little Kenny Lay and a foreign-exchange student named Chalabi. Both of these youngsters have been expelled from other schools due to their involvement in cheating other students out of their lunch money. We feel that these kinds of relationships can only lead to no good, and hope that you will advise your child accordingly.
Georgie often displays aggressive behaviour in the schoolyard, and recently assaulted a student in another school district, completely unprovoked. When asked about this incident, Georgie insisted that the other child was armed and dangerous. When investigation into the matter proved otherwise, Georgie changed his story several times: he was just trying to "democratize" the other child, the other child's school was harboring gang members, and so on. Quite frankly, his story on this topic has so changed from week to week, we simply can't trust his word at all anymore.
Georgie's friends, while not great in number, are very loyal, but tend to be over-protective. If any of the other students point out Georgie's failing grades, these friends simply shout them down and tell them not to speak at all. When Georgie was summoned to the principal's office several weeks ago, he insisted that his "best friend" come with him. We feel that it is in Georgie's best interest to learn to stand up for himself; failure to do so could seriously damage his ability to handle a leadership role in his adult years.
As you are aware, final exams will be held in November, and Georgie's past performance leads us to conclude that he will not be able to achieve the grades necessary to continue on with another four-year term at our institution.
Yours Truly,
Ms. J.Q. Public,
Assistant Principal
Posted at 11:30 AM in Humor | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Monday, July 12, 2004
Other New York Post Headline Scoops
As everyone knows by now, the NY Post ran a front page story, headlined "Kerry Picks Gephardt to be VP."
Only he didn't.
Now, via Fark, comes this collection of dozens of front page stories from the New York Post, photo-shopped for your amusement.
These are my favorites:







Posted at 08:20 AM in Humor | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Sunday, July 11, 2004
ELECTION DAY USA: CD Compilation of Anti-Bush, Anti-War Music
.jpg)
Here’s an unusual way to use both broadband and MP3s to make a political statement: A CD Compilation of Anti-Bush, Anti-War Music -- given away for free -- via the internet:
SEA LION RECORDS is proud to present a CD COMPILATION of ANTI-BUSH, ANTI-WAR music to be released to college and public radio stations during late SUMMER 2004, titled: ELECTION DAY USAI’m not usually a fan of alt.protest rock, but some of the songs are pretty good, and more than a few are quite humorous and amusing.ALL 20 SONGS on the COMPILATION are LISTED BELOW, with FREE RealAudio and MP3 links... ENJOY!
16 different artists were selected to be part of this compilation. The relatively small number of songs that professionally made CDs can hold did limit how many songs we could include. Our sincerest thanks to everyone who submitted work that wasn't included. Your efforts are greatly appreciated by all of us, looking for 'closure' to this Bush matter in November 2004.
Check ‘em out.
Here's a song list:
DUCT TAPE 3:34 They are knock-you-dead funny, those folks in our Bush administration, when you look at things through John McCutcheon's eyes. His music is sticky (you'll want to hear it more than once), as his subject. In this case, it's the common household product that BushCo told us we needed to protect ourselves against terrorism last year. This song's message still holds true today. It really is sticky, this Duct Tape.
DUCT TAPE 2003 John McCutcheon/Appalsongs (ASCAP)
codePINK 3:28 You gotta hand it to this energetic duo of award-winning musicians. Pat Humphries & Sandy O nailed the Bush-backed Carlyle Group and their backroom business dealings with the bin Ladens long before Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 brought that fact to theatres nationwide. This song takes music beyond the traditional music industry, which, like government and other war profiteers, silences dissent. Witness the rise of Clear Channel's monopolization of our "public" airwaves, at the hands of right-wing Republican ownership, but that's another story (we'll be talking about real soon).
codePINK 2004 Pat Humphries & Sandy O / Moving Forward Music (BMI)
KICK OUT THE REPUBLICANS 2:40 Humorous and harmonious amped-up classic rock that practically demands your attention, Donny Daley rocks the world with this catchy tune. Kick Out The Republicans is a candid look at the Bush Administration, and what needs to happen to them in November '04.... Remember, somewhere in Texas, a village is missing its idiot.
KICK OUT THE REPUBLICANS c 2004 Donny Daley
BAD PRESIDENT 1:31 Yikes! This release from folk artist Yikes McGee tells you Guthrie-style how he feels about President Bush, and we hear that his viewpoint is shared by lots of folks everywhere. There are two more short folk songs from Yikes later in the compilation, so stay tuned.
LISTEN to a FREE RealAudio stream of the full-length Bad President song, optimized for dial-up modem connections... click here .
DOWNLOAD aFREE MP3 file of the full-length Bad President song... click here using the right button on your mouse and 'save target as' .
BAD PRESIDENT c 2003 A.J. (Yikes) McGee
SONOFA BUSH 3:52 An enlightened, musical, satirical look at the President we 'elected' in 2000. In a nutshell, it's comedic alternative spoken word with a downtempo hip-hop feel. The 'voice' of George W Bush, rappin' his way through recent history, with lyrics inspired by actual mispronunciations and misguided thoughts that Dubya has shared with the world.
LISTEN to a FREE RealAudio stream of the full-length Sonofa Bush song, optimized for dial-up modem connections... click here .
DOWNLOAD aFREE MP3 file of the full-length Sonofa Bush song... click here using the right button on your mouse and 'save target as' .
SONOFA BUSH c 2004 Sea Lion (BMI)
LET’S PRETEND 3:25 Five-time Grammy-nominated musician John McCutcheon has released literally dozens of records, and is master of a dozen different instruments. In this tune, he shares his genius Randy Newman-esque vocals in an attempt to pretend-his-way-out-of current events, just like the man we call Dumbya.
LET'S PRETEND c 2003 John McCutcheon/Appalsongs (ASCAP)
CONSEQUENCES 2:52 In the words of artist Amy Martin, "We are so proud, in this country, of our ability to take action, and at the same time, often so unaware of how those actions affect other people and places. When writing this song, I was overcome by a feeling of urgency for us to examine those repercussions, and take responsibility for them." We couldn't have said it better.
CONSEQUENCES c 2003 Amy Martin (BMI)
DO YOU HEAR? 2:59 Veteran song collaborators Phil Klein and Maria DeAngelis teamed up to create this French 'musette' sound, unlike anything else in this compilation. Originally composed in French, the lyrics were translated to make the sage lyrics accessible to all of us non-French speaking folks.
DO YOU HEAR? ?2001 Phil Klein & Maria DeAngelis (ASCAP)
PEACE INSIDE 8:10 The longest track on this compilation, with Tom Waits style vocals countered by sweet female harmony. Songwriter and vocalist Ralph Stever says, "I saw where Bush and the boys were going with their Iraq spin, and I knew they were opening the War Room. Soon I realized it was hard to be an activist for peace while in the midst of fighting my own anger toward what the administration was doing." This song is the result.
PEACE INSIDE c 2002 Dancing Mountain Records
HOME NO MORE 2:42 The beautiful voice on this slow sad ballad belongs to Kris Penn. The guy seated at right is Thomas Pace, who interrupted work on a follow-up CD to his successful debut to write some songs that address the current political climate. This is one of 'em, and a great one at that.
HOME NO MORE c 2004 Thomas Pace
I DON’T WANT TO BE A SOLDIER 3:36 Time marches on, but 88-year-old Julius from George and Julius keeps on telling us all 'like it is.' The fact that Julius is as committed to fighting Bush’s re-election as he is gives us all hope for the future. If he can do it, everyone can do it. George Mann and Julius Margolin are anti-Bush pro-Labor folkies, and they dedicate this to all the victims of Bush’s illegal invasion and especially to the young men and women who might be considering joining Bush’s armed forces. War is ugly and evil, and this war is especially so.
I DON'T WANT TO BE A SOLDIER c 2003 Julius Margolin and George Mann
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE 3:36 John Kasper's musical talent and ambition rival that of many big-time musicians. Anthony Krizan of the legendary *Spin Doctors* produced this great song from the New-Jersey-based John Kasper Band.
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE c 2004 The John Kasper Band
PROPAGANDY 2:22 Yikes McGee sings out the truth about propaganda, as the Bush team practices it.
PROPAGANDY c 2003 A.J. (Yikes) McGee
OPERATION IRAQI LIBERATION 2:43 Proof that there are some brilliant satirists who have infiltrated the government at its highest levels, "OIL" is, in fact, the acronym first (briefly) used to name the invasion of Iraq, which was later changed to Operation Iraqi Freedom.
OPERATION IRAQI LIBERATION c 2003 David Rovics (BMI)
ROGUE NATION 2:34 Mike and Dave (the tightly wound springs of COILER) consider themselves forward-thinking throwbacks to a simpler, more complicated era, when creating retro-modern acoustic techno-pop folk metal was encouraged in schools and churches. Now that schools and churches create only bullies and the hapless drones they ride like donkeys, isn't it time to make up your own mind?
ROGUE NATION c 2004 Coiler
COWBOY PRESIDENT 2:38 Yikes McGee’s third appearance on this compilation, Cowboy President is a smooth folk protest song. Proof that one voice and one guitar is all it takes to make great music. Listen and help rid the world of mad cow(boy) disease.
COWBOY PRESIDENT c 2003 A.J. (Yikes) McGee
SOMEWHERE DOWN THE LINE 2:38 Country rock roots with a thick dirty edge, framing the band's lyrical passion for justice with a wildly original rock and roll sound. The upside down MAYDAY MAYDAY flag motif the band has adopted befits the results our current befuddled administration has embraced.
SOMEWHERE DOWN THE LINE c 2004 Old No. 8
RISE UP! 3:14 Living in Thailand, musician David Freyer watched coverage of a Washington DC protest march, got fired up, and wrote some lyrics. Within a week, his band The Positive Chi Units had laid down this emotive track honoring the true voice of America. You! Make your voice heard on (or before) November 2, 2004. Use it, or lose it. And please, register to vote, if you haven't already done so.
RISE UP! c 2004 David Freyer and the Positive Chi Units
SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN 4:47 Promoting peace through culture, the hip yet unsettling backbeat and use of minor chords help make this song majorly appealing... Rhett Redelings-MacDermott's thoughtful and engaging lyrics are something to believe in, for sure. In addition to our collective urgency to find peace, we also need to believe that Bush will go back to Texas in November, with your help.
SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN c 2004 R-Three (BMI)
THE WAR IS OVER 3:08 It's true, David Rovics has a tight fist on the pulse of intervention through music. Since the mid-90's, he has spent most of his time on tour, playing concerts across the US, Canada and Europe. Here, he gives us this song of lies that George W Bush started propagating back when he thought he could do what he wanted (and perhaps more importantly, what Dick Cheney wanted) in 2003. David is an established voice in musical protest against the Bush Company administration, and he should be commended for that service to our country.
THE WAR IS OVER c 2003 David Rovics (BMI)
unlike some folks we know of, we actually are "uniters, not dividers"
sea lion records brought together the artists for this compilation, in the hope that all this great music in one place will inspire folks out there to participate in the ongoing political dialogue, in whatever way(s) you see fit.
remember... it's now or never... use it or lose it... just do it...
...AND THANKS FOR LISTENING
Posted at 09:03 AM in Music, Politics | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack
Saturday, July 10, 2004
White House Abuse of Science
On February 18, 2004, 62 preeminent scientists including Nobel laureates, National Medal of Science recipients, former senior advisers to administrations of both parties, numerous members of the National Academy of Sciences, and other well-known researchers released a statement titled Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policy Making. In this statement, the scientists charged the Bush administration with widespread and unprecedented "manipulation of the process through which science enters into its decisions." The scientists’ statement made brief reference to specific cases that illustrate this pattern of behavior. In conjunction with the statement, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) released detailed documentation backing up the scientists’ charges in its report, Scientific Integrity in Policy Making.
Since the release of the UCS report in February, the administration has continued to undermine the integrity of science in policy making seemingly unchecked. Many scientists have spoken out about their frustration with an administration that has undermined the quality of the science that informs policy making by suppressing, distorting, or manipulating the work done by scientists at federal agencies and on scientific advisory panels. For instance, Michael Kelly, a biologist who had served at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Marine Fisheries Service for nine years, recently resigned his position and issued an indictment of Bush administration practices. As Kelly wrote, "I speak for many of my fellow biologists who are embarrassed and disgusted by the agency’s apparent misuse of science."1
Scientific Integrity in Policy Making: Further investigation of the Bush administration's abuse of science investigates several new incidents that have surfaced since the February 2004 UCS report. These new incidents have been corroborated through in-depth interviews and internal government documents, including some documents released through the Freedom of Information Act. The cases that follow include:
- egregious disregard of scientific study, across several agencies, regarding the environmental impacts of mountaintop removal mining;
- censorship and distortion of scientific analysis, and manipulation of the scientific process, across several issues and agencies in regard to the Endangered Species Act;
- distortion of scientific knowledge in decisions about emergency contraception;
- new evidence about the use of political litmus tests for scientific advisory panel appointees. These new revelations put to rest any arguments offered by the administration that the cases to date have been isolated incidents involving a few bad actors.
Concern in the scientific community has continued to grow. In the months since the original UCS report, more than 4,000 scientists have signed onto the scientists’ statement. Signers include 48 Nobel laureates, 62 National Medal of Science recipients, and 127 members of the National Academy of Sciences. A number of these scientists have served in multiple administrations, both Democratic and Republican, underscoring the unprecedented nature of this administration’s practices and demonstrating that the issues of scientific integrity transcend partisan politics.
The United States has an impressive history of investing in and reaping the benefits of scientific research. The actions by the Bush administration threaten to undermine the morale and compromise the integrity of scientists working for and advising America’s world-class governmental research institutions and agencies. Not only does the public expect and deserve government to provide it with accurate information, the government has a responsibility to ensure that policy decisions are not based on intentionally or knowingly flawed science. To do so carries serious implications for the health, safety, and environment of all Americans.
Given the lack of serious consideration and response by the administration to concerns raised by scores of prominent scientists, UCS is committed to continuing to investigate and publicize cases—corroborated by witnesses and documentation—in which politics is allowed to stifle or distort the integrity of the scientific process in governmental policy making. UCS—working with scientists across many disciplines, other organizations, and elected officials—will also seek to develop and implement solutions that will protect government scientists from retribution when they bring scientific abuse to light, provide better scientific advice to Congress, strengthen the role of the Office of Science and Technology Policy, strengthen and ensure adherence to conflict of interest guidelines for federal advisory panels, and ensure full access to government scientific analysis that has not been legitimately classified for national security reasons.
Posted at 09:01 AM in Politics, Science | Permalink
| Comments (0)
| TrackBack
Download the new report.
Friday, July 09, 2004
100 MP3 blogs
Cocaine blunts and hip hop tapes
That's just A - C; D - Z continues here
Dolby Surrender
Enthusiastic But Mediocre
Empty Handed
Empty Free
Fruits Of Chaos
Mystical Beast
music (for robots)
Radio Babylon
Royal music
Raymondo's dance-o-rama
Rock 'n' Roll in the Real World
Retrolicious
Radio Babylon
Rub
Stereogum
So This Is Love?
Suburbs Are Killing Us
Sleeve Notes
Soul Sides
Talkie Walkie
Teaching the indie kids todance again (TTIKTDA)
totally fuzzy
Tyrone Shoelaces
word in the alleys
WFMU's blast o' hot air
Posted at 06:59 AM in Music, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (14) | TrackBack
Thursday, July 08, 2004
MP3 Blogs
Since you can't really find much but the same lousy 9 songs on the radio, consider checking out an MP3 blog:
"A new genre of Web sites that offer an eclectic mix of free music downloads may not be strictly legit, but the sites' creators say they're doing the beleaguered record industry a favor.
Named for the MP3 music format and the popular self-published Web sites known as blogs, they are part online mixtape, part diary, and part music magazine.
The tunes are drawn from remixes, forgotten genres and out-of-print albums, usually accompanied by detailed descriptions and reviews.
"Most of the artists that I cover are pretty obscure, and I like to help them get a bit of publicity and grassroots support," said Matthew Perpetua, a DJ, freelance writer and creator of Fluxblog (http://newflux.blogspot.com), one of the oldest MP3 blogs.
"The blog also serves as a musical diary for my own purposes," Perpetua said. "It's interesting to go back through it and see what I was interested in, and how my tastes ebb and flow."
Current offerings at Fluxblog include an obscure funk duet by Quincy Jones and Bill Cosby and an unreleased single by songstress Fiona Apple. Once listeners find an MP3 blogger with a simpatico musical taste, they can check back daily for new tunes. MP3 blogs are intricately cross-referenced via long lists of links, and hopping from site to site can easily consume several hours.
Well-known blogs include Soul Sides (http://www.o-dub.com/crates/weblog/blogger.html), which has underground hip-hop and forgotten R&B; The Tofu Hut (http://tofuhut.blogspot.com/), whose offerings range from gospel artists Blind Mamie and A.C. Forehand to rockabilly performer Carl Perkins to soul god Donnie Hathaway; and Said the Gramophone (http://www.tangmonkey.com/blogs/music/), which has indie rock, folk music and hip-hop.
Here are a few others web sites:
Music for Robots
-- A group blog with genres including electronica, hip-hop and punk
http://music.for-robots.com/Largehearted Boy
-- Prolific postings of live sets and B-sides
http://www.largeheartedboy.com/blog/Ready Rock Moe Rex
-- Recent postings include Afrobeat and R&B
http://www.livejournal.com/users/moebius_rex/The Number One Songs in Heaven
-- Old school funk and soul
http://www.londonlee.com/blog.htmlThe Suburbs Are Killing Us
-- Recent postings include reggae and folk
http://www.christopherporter.com/
See also: our very next post: 100 MP3 Blogs
<spacer>
Source:
Livewire: MP3 Blogs Serve Rare Songs, Dusty Grooves
By Adam Pasick
Reuters, Wed Jul 7, 2004 02:57 PM ET
http://www.reuters.com/printerFriendlyPopup.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5611461
Posted at 09:02 PM in Music, Weblogs | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Health benefits of Coffee ?

Any occasional reader of this blog should be familiar with how seriously I take my coffee (Your Coffee Sucks!). So you can imagine my delight while visiting in Chitown when I picked up the Chicago Tribune and saw an article discussing the growing evidence on the health benefits of a cup of joe. The latest research reveals a linkage between coffee drinking and a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes -- "a growing health epidemic that is closely linked to the rising rates of obesity." And then there's this factoid: Finland has the world's highest per capita coffee consumption(?!?) That's where researchers discovered that coffee appeared to have a protective effect against the development of type 2 diabetes. The more cups of coffee consumed, the greater the protection.
Here's an excerpt:
"Some people just can't get started in the morning without a freshly brewed cup of joe. For others, this beloved beverage has become more than a morning routine. A stop at the local coffeehouse for a cappuccino or iced mocha has become an afternoon tradition.Fascinating stuff -- and quite delicious!Though the virtues of coffee drinking may have been debated in the past, now there appear to be new reasons to rejoice over java. More and more studies have linked coffee consumption to a number of health benefits, including a reduced risk of diabetes, Parkinson's disease, gallstones, colon cancer and potentially heart disease.
"Coffee has much more in it than caffeine," said Dr. PeMartin, director of the Vanderbilt University's Institute for Coffee Studies, which conducts medical research on coffee and is funded by a grant from a consortium of coffee-producing countries. "It's a very complex beverage that contains hundreds of compounds, including many with antioxidant effects."
Though the tea industry has been touting its antioxidants, turns out coffee may contain even more--specifically polyphenols. One of the most potent antioxidants in coffee is called chlorogenic acid, which is partially responsible for the coffee flavor. Some reports estimate that more than 850 compounds are packed inside the humble bean.
Martin said that the roasting process appears to change the structure of the compounds in coffee--boosting the potential disease-fighting benefits. Martin, who is also a professor of psychiatry and pharmacology at Vanderbilt, is looking at the potential use of coffee compounds to treat addiction and depression. Past studies indicate that coffee may help lift moods, reduce anxiety and depression, and even reduce the risk of suicide.
Source:
No clouds in your coffee
Drink up, evidence is growing on the health benefits of a cup of joe
Janet Helm, Special to the Tribune
Published July 7, 2004
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/food/chi-0407070186jul07,1,1948678.story
Posted at 08:24 AM in Food and Drink | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack
Wednesday, July 07, 2004
Flying Dog Microbrew
Love the name of this micro beer: Flying dog

Posted at 06:53 AM in Food and Drink | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
I'm Chevy Chase -- and you're not
Tuesday, July 06, 2004
Sites to try when other engines fail you
The San Jose Mercury News has some good advice on what to do when other engines fail you:
"Admit it. You have a Google habit. Or a Yahoo habit. Every time you need to find something on the Internet, you click over to one of those big search powerhouses.
Well, search fans, we're here to tell you that there's a whole big world of Internet searching out there, and Google and Yahoo are just a part of it. This week, I asked Price and researcher Tara Calishain, who runs the ResearchBuzz Web site at www.researchbuzz.com, to share some of their favorite search sites.
• Libraries: Not surprisingly, Price's first suggestion is to visit your local library's Web site.Libraries have access to many databases that would otherwise be off-limits to most people. And you can often access them online with nothing more than a library card number. Here's a link to the database section of the San Jose Public Library: www.sjpl.lib.ca.us/research/databases. It leads to a wealth of databases that information about biographies, political speeches, businesses, authors and health, to name a few.
In a similar vein is the Librarians Index to the Internet (www.lii.org), compiled by librarians in California and Washington. It's a searchable subject directory of more than 12,000 Internet resources, each with a short description so you know what you're about to click on. Topics range from health and medicine to Web page design.
• News: Yahoo and Google both have top-notch news search sites that pull in thousands of feeds from around the world. But if you want local news, Topix.net may work better. The site monitors breaking news from more than 6,000 sources and lets users filter results by ZIP code.
Findory News, meanwhile, creates ``personalized'' newspapers. Findory (www.findory.com) watches which news links you click on and then emphasizes those types of stories each time you visit. Interested in India politics? Findory will learn that from your clicking habits and bump those types of stories to the top of its home page.
• Audio searching: ``It's not just the written, but the spoken word that is searchable,'' Price says.
And with that, he points us to SpeechBot (http://speechbot.research.compaq
.com), a search engine for audio and video content. A product of HP Labs in Palo Alto, the site has indexed 17,517 hours of content from sites such as PBS's Online NewsHour, and the Motley Fool Radio Show.
• Blogs: Blogs are increasingly becoming a primary source of news for many people. But neither Yahoo nor Google allow users to limit their Web searches to blogs. For that, you can turn to a bevy of smaller services, including Feedster (www.feedster.com), Technorati (technorati.com)
and DayPop (www.daypop.com). Technorati says it's now tracking more than 2.4 million blogs.
• General searching: Vivisimo (www.vivisimo.com) is not really a search engine because it does not crawl or index the Web. Instead, it organizes the search results from other search engines, clustering them into categories.
Price and Calishain both mentioned Gigablast (www.gigablast.com) as an up-and-coming search site. And Price says AskJeeves (www.ask.com) has improved significantly over the years.
Other general search sites include ZapMeta (www.zapmeta.com) and Mooter (www.mooter.com).
Then there's GuruNet (www.gurunet.com), a small Israeli company whose goal is to take you straight to the information you're seeking. The basic package is free. For $29.99 a year, subscribers can access a far bigger storehouse of information.
Great stuff . . .
Source:
Sites to try when other engines fail you
By Michael Bazeley
Mercury News, Wed, May. 19, 2004
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/business/8701595.htm
Posted at 06:44 AM in Web/Tech | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Monday, July 05, 2004
Army Stage-Managed Fall of Hussein Statue
Way back on September 05, 2003, I posted the question: "Was the pulling down of Saddam's Statue a staged media event?" Based upon a photo from the Centre for Research on Globalisation, it certainly appeared that the visual equivalent to the Fall of the Berlin wall was staged. But you read little of that in the mass media.
Now, according to the Los Angeles Times, we learn that, far from the spontaneous act of a crowd of enthused Iraqis, this was indeed a improvised PsyOp event:
As the Iraqi regime was collapsing on April 9, 2003, Marines converged on Firdos Square in central Baghdad, site of an enormous statue of Saddam Hussein. It was a Marine colonel — not joyous Iraqi civilians, as was widely assumed from the TV images — who decided to topple the statue, the Army report said. And it was a quick-thinking Army psychological operations team that made it appear to be a spontaneous Iraqi undertaking.
After the colonel — who was not named in the report — selected the statue as a "target of opportunity," the psychological team used loudspeakers to encourage Iraqi civilians to assist, according to an account by a unit member.
Hey, that's what happens during war. I have no problem with the use of that sort of managed image during the war to help demoralize the enemy fighters.
The "quick thinking Marine" and Army psychological team who made the effort to topple the statue appear Iraqi-inspired -- in part because they packed the vehicle with cheering Iraqi children -- deserves kudos for their creative efforts during battle.
Where these things always go astray is the failure, after the war, to acknowledge the deception. Invariably, Psy Ops events used during battle against the enemy eventually is used to manipulate the population of the country that managed the event. Its crossing the line from legitimate battle tot actic to Orwellian propaganda.
I cannot count how many times I've seen that image on CNBC, on Fox, on CNN. Each time it runs, it raises emotional uissues we now know are false and deceptive.
After this Army revelation, will these stations still run what we have learned was not what it appears to be?

We'll find out soon enough.
Sources:
Army Stage-Managed Fall of Hussein StatueDavid Zucchino
L.A. Times, July 3, 2004
http://www.latimes.com/la-na-statue3jul03,1,7327035.story
Centre for Research on Globalisation:
The pulling down of the Statue was a staged media event
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NYI304A.html
Posted at 08:30 AM in Politics, War/Defense | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Hubble discovers 100 new planets
The Hubble Space Telescope may have discovered as many as 100 new planets orbiting stars in our galaxy.
Hubble's harvest comes from a sweep of thousands of stars in the dome-like bulge of the Milky Way.
If confirmed it would almost double the number of planets known to be circling other stars to about 230.
The discovery will lend support to the idea that almost every sunlike star in our galaxy, and probably the Universe, is accompanied by planets.

Very, very cool . . .
Source:
Hubble discovers 100 new planets
By Dr David Whitehouse
BBC News Online science editor
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3856401.stm
Posted at 06:46 AM in Science | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Sunday, July 04, 2004
FREE SPEECH: Do Americans really believe in it?

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
essays & effluvia, Chicago style: Whenever I travel, I always seek out the regional papers. Its instructive to find a little local flavor, and read a perspective different from one's usual views. When you come from, as Spalding Gray used to describe it, "a small Island off the East Coast of America," its good on occasion to check out other voices.
So I was intrigued today, on the Fourth of July, to see the following rather interesting survey from the Chicago Tribune on their Perspectives section on the First Amendment.
Before lamenting the woeful state of Democracy in this nation, or the shocking ignorance of the responses of some of the poll participants (print edition only), be aware that these views are not all that unusual. I've seen many such polls asking questions like this over the year, and once I got over the initial shock, it actually makes some sense, making hte drafters of the 1st Amendment seem all the more wiser. The Founding Fathers were concerned as much by the "Tyranny of the majority" as they were outright oppression by the government.
The good news is that 84% of Americans believe groups opposed to the war be allowed to demonstrate and protest against the war. The bad news is that this remains, in part, a deeply puritanical country, immature and almost childlike in its fears of all things sexual.
Europe, we are not.
There are many deep paradoxes about this. While there is strong opposition amongst many to business and financial regulations by the government, there does not seem to be the same ardor for keeping government out of sexual or cultural issues. When it comes to matters involving dirty-naughty-peepee stuff, there is a deep vein (even a majority) who are quite comfortable with government regulation of content. And yet when you consider that the porn industry generates more revenue than the film, music and sports businesses combined, this seems sort of odd.
When you read some of the following outlandish and frighteningly ignorant statements, remember to cherish the First Amendment, and do whatever needs to be done from the relentless attempts to sandpaper it away, one small restriction at a time. (Unfortunately, only the print edition -- but not the inline version -- has interviews with the poll participants.) Although that's what some of the public -- more than half -- says it wants, but I suspect those making these statemments have not considered the longer term implications of these off the cuff, telephone interviewed views.
-BR
Should the government be able to limit what you can read, hear and watch?The Chicago Tribune set out to measure some attitudes about those questions across America.
The results of the Tribune poll of 1,000 adults, taken from June 23 to 27 and presented in this Perspective, are remarkable not for the support they display for 1st Amendment rights, which was anticipated, but for the size of the group that would choose to muzzle all kinds of expression, from Stern's vulgarities to news reports on the prisoner abuse scandal in Iraq to criticism of a wartime government.
From the Internet to the radio networks to cable television and newspapers, substantial minorities would opt for an array of controls aimed at whittling away free expression, criticism and, yes, even political commentary. It does not mean, of course, that freedom of speech is in direct jeopardy. What it means is that those who would aggressively move to limit expression, however innocent or offensive, can depend on the support of a substantial audience.
Freedom of speech, then, is a right that could be diminished by ever-so-thin slices, a move that would apparently win the support of a lot of Americans as long as Howard Stern and his shock jock buddies were the characters being silenced. The Tribune poll shows that majorities actually support limitations in some areas. Generally, they involve sexual expression on radio or violence and sex on cable TV or on the Internet. The poll suggests that 76 percent of adults across the nation have access to the Internet, where content and access range from simple e-mail and scholarly documents and advertising to raw pornography.
It is the commercial hunting ground of saint and scoundrel alike, as comfortable for con experts offering Nigerian fortunes in exchange for a bank account number as it is for the well-intentioned who only want us all to be happier, thinner, bigger, prettier or whatever else might be packaged and sold.
There are signs in the Tribune poll that people are beginning to tire of the purple nature of some of the Internet's content. Just over half of the respondents in the Tribune poll said the government should impose restrictions on it. Only 38 percent said there should be no restriction. Republicans and people in the Midwest were the strongest backers of restrictions on content, but even a slight majority of Democrats said there should be controls.
Cable television, now something of a national theater of whatever anyone wants to broadcast that has some commercial value, is another target for government regulation, with 55 percent saying the government should restrict sex and violence programming on cable TV.
The strongest support for restriction, however, comes in that very area that is the target of so much attention now, the shock jocks and their dependence on sexual references. A full 64 percent of those questioned said "radio personalities who use implicit or explicit sexual expressions" should simply not be allowed on the air. Only one in three people said they should. Almost 6 in 10 support heavy FCC fines of radio stations that broadcast that kind of content. Just 33 percent disapproved.
Shifting into politics, the poll also discovered that the nation is split on whether there should have been restrictions on coverage of the Iraqi prisoner scandal. That means one in two people think there should have been some kind of restraint on coverage. Almost everyone believes people should be allowed to protest the war. About 6 in 10 think it should be OK to allow people to call for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
But almost 4 in 10 say that should not be allowed.
Twenty percent say negative reporting on the war should not be allowed. Twenty percent say critical editorials against a war should not be allowed. About the same number feel that the 1st Amendment itself goes too far. A little over 10 percent say the Patriot Act, which expanded government search and surveillance powers, didn't go far enough. Put those numbers together and think about a nation as a roomful of, say, 10 people.
The poll indicates that at least two of those people, and in some cases as many as five or six of them, would embrace government controls of some kind on free speech, particularly when it has sexual content or is heard as unpatriotic.
A TRIBUNE POLL ON THE 1ST AMENDMENTShould the government impose restrictions on information and content that appears on the Internet
52% YES
38% NO
7% DON'T KNOW
3% UNFAMILIAR WITH INTERNETShould the government restrict violence and sexual content that appears on cable TV?
55% YES
40% NO
5% DON'T KNOW
1% UNFAMILIAR WITH CABLE TVShould radio personalities who use implicit or explicit sexual expressions be allowed on the air?
64% NO
30% YES
5% DON'T KNOWDo you approve of heavy FCC fines of radio stations due to broadcasts they considered indecent?
58% YES
33% NO
9% DON'T KNOWShould there be restrictions on the extent of the news coverage of the war in Iraq?
60% NO
33% YES
4% DON'T KNOW
(Even if lives are endangered? 4% NO)Should there have been restrictions on the extent of the news coverage of Iraqi prisoner abuse?
49% NO
47% YES
4% DON'T KNOWShould groups opposed to the war be allowed to demonstrate and protest against the war?
84% YES
13% NO
3% DON'T KNOWDo you think the Patriot Act goes too far, not far enough or is it about right?
41% TOO FAR
38% ABOUT RIGHT
12% NOT ENOUGH
8% DON'T KNOWShould groups advocating overthrow of the government and how to do so be allowed to make their views known?
56% YES
37% NO
7% DON'T KNOWShould the media be allowed to publish or broadcast news stories that suggest war is not going well?
75% YES
20% NO
5% DON'T KNOWShould the media be allowed to publish or broadcast editorial opinions critical of how the war is being handled?
76% YES
20% NO
4% DON'T KNOWDoes the First Amendment go too far in guaranteeing rights to free expression, or is it just about right?
64% ABOUT RIGHT
23% TOO FAR
5% NOT ENOUGH
8% DON'T KNOWShould Administration officals be allowed to criticize the adminstration soon after they leave?57% YES
35% NO
7% DON'T KNOWDo you think media coverage is biased in news stories about politics, elected officials and election campaigns?
76% YES
14% NO
9% DON'T KNOWWhich Party does the media coverage favor?
22% Democrats
13% Republicans
36% Both
5% Don't Know
The full text of the article is available at the link below; Its well worth checking out the print edition to see, in its entirety, interviews with participants.
Source:
FREE SPEECH: Do Americans really believe in it?
Charles M. Madigan, Perspective editor
Chicago Tribune, July 4, 2004
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/perspective/chi-0407030292jul04,1,304700.story
Posted at 09:00 AM in Media, Politics | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Independence Day

via Poster Glory
http://www.posterglory.com/military/military.htm
Posted at 12:33 AM in War/Defense | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack
Saturday, July 03, 2004
He Plays the Piano with his Balls
Its really quite amazing
http://www.anothersite.co.uk/gallery/index.php?action=dorate&cat=7&pic=1179
Posted at 07:56 AM in Humor | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack
Friday, July 02, 2004
The gorgeous soundscapes of gentle drones
If you are a fan of Brian Eno's (and that includes Roxy Music or Talking Heads), then you may enjoy this odd little article in the St. Petersburg Times: Reasons to know Brian Eno
"Look for Eno's influence all over the music of Moby, Aphex Twin, DJ Spooky, DJ Shadow and other contemporary sound collagists who combine electronic music with the "found" sound of bird wings flapping, water dropping into puddles, machinery and random industrial noise.The story goes, Eno concocted the idea for ambient music while laid up in a hospital with a broken leg. He was going nutty listening to the repetitious sound of medical machinery and construction going on outside. Eventually, Eno gave in to the drones, learning to relax and relish predictable noise.
If you came into Eno knowing him for his ambient music, as I did, the four early albums reissued by Astralwerks will jar you. The first time I heard Eno's pop, I was shocked but thrilled. It's wildly imaginative, punky and original. It holds up well, too.
Like anything Eno touches, these first solo albums bristle with creativity. Here's a rundown:
* Here Come the Warm Jets (1974) is Eno's first foray on his own. Grab it. Or grab it if you dig wily pop music. Warm Jets is filled with catchy tunes such as the two-note Baby's On Fire and Needles in the Camel's Eye. They could be radio hits, but no, Eno has to get wonky on every one of them: bizarre lyrics that are too easy to sing along to, beats that grow manic, guitar that goes from pretty to pretty freaky. Guests include former Roxy mates Phil Manzanera and Andy Mackay. Guitar genius Robert Fripp (of King Crimson) is also onboard.* Next came Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy) (1974), featuring the effervescent China My China, which had the sound of a typewriter looped into guitar swirls. Then we heard:
* Another Green World (1975). The third solo album finds Eno upping the synths with the gorgeous midtempo ballad I'll Come Running, with the sweetest melody you ever heard. Who's that drumming on this largely instrumental album? Phil Collins? Borrowed from Genesis, back when Genesis was weird, when Peter Gabriel was its singer and Collins wasn't boring and mainstream.
* Before & After Science (1977) could be considered a "studio composition" because Eno crafted the final product by grafting layers and layers of recordings together. It's an amazingly textural album, like the sonic equivalent of an Imagist painting. Eno ups the synthesizers on this one with the noteworthy, dissonant piece Backwater. The album, which came out around the punk explosion, sounds chaotic, filled with disco beats and guitar raunch. The spooky Julie With . . . captures this tone with its ambiguous account of a . . . murder? Or a pleasant afternoon rendezvous?
Good stuff from an intriguing and eccentric musician . . .
