WeedShare Music Model

Friday, September 26, 2003 | 01:46 PM
in Music

Good Morning Silicon Valley posted a terrific response to the Great Recording Industry Business Model Contest from Weedshare:

"Our new music sharing service, which went "live" less than 3 weeks ago, doesn't sue people who share files. It pays them. Rather than try to punish people who don't respect copyrights, we reward people who do.

We have developed a proprietary variation on the Windows Media file format which allows us to track the distribution and redistribution of files. We call our format "Weed" (as in "spreads like a...").

We encode files for content owners and send them back to the owner. The owner may then distribute these Weed files in any way they see fit: download site, peer-to-peer network, email, CD, we don't care.

Anybody who receives a Weed file from anywhere can listen to it 3 times for free (using Windows Media Player). After that, a message pops up encouraging them to buy it, which they do by clicking the "Buy" button. The song's price, which is set by the owner, is deducted from the listener's Weed account. Once you buy the song, you can play it on up to 3 computers, burn it to CD, and download it to a portable player.

Here's the twist: once you've bought the song, you're encouraged to share it. Say you send it to your friend Al. If Al buys it, you get 20% of the sale (and the content owner, as always, gets 50%). If Al sends it to Becky and she buys it, you get 10% and Al gets 20%. If Becky sends it to Chuck and he buys it, you get 5%, Al gets 10%, and Becky gets 20%. After that, you're out of the loop, but the content owner is happy because their material has been exposed to a lot of people, and they get 50% of every sale. The money they would have spent on promoters and payola goes instead to the fans, who provide the best kind of promotion there is: word of mouth.

If you do the math, you'll see that if every recipient finds 2 more buyers, he or she winds up earning 120% of whatever the file cost. With 3 new buyers at each level, sharers earn almost 3 times the file's cost.

Casual users can reduce or eliminate their cost of purchasing music. More active users can develop a hobby business that's fun and modestly profitable (typically by creating a personal web page offering downloads of their favorite music to friends, classmates, etc.). Record labels can realize significant revenue from their catalogs, and the sharing incentives provide a fantastic way to spread the word about new artists, new CD releases, etc.

Our service is especially attractive to unsigned artists who have no practical way to distribute their material and get paid. We offer them do-it-yourself, pay-as-you-go distribution and promotion, with zero up-front cost.

That's a really creative and interesting idea -- wrapping a multi-level marketing model around a DRM issue. I like it -- but have a few very minor quibbles:

1) Windows Media Player? It sucks. I'd rather see a cross platform, open architecture. But hey, that's DRM for ya. (They say they'll have other platform versions soon).

2) Hack-arounds. Can the Weed/WMP DRM system be broken? If so, than it kinda defeats the purpose. (although those looking to download for free will download MP3s, not Weeds)

3) RIAA: Will the goons be able to distinguish between the sharers of these products? Will I be inviting a lawsuit from the Music Police if I share weed products?

All told, its a way cool idea that has some promise . . .

Friday, September 26, 2003 | 01:46 PM | Permalink | Comments (8) | TrackBack (1)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference WeedShare Music Model:

» weedshare from meta-roj blog
i might be coming in on the tail of interest here, but since i do have some observations, and a blog, and a [small] audience of dedicated fans hanging on my every word when it comes to the music business... [Read More]

Tracked on Oct 6, 2003 5:21:44 AM


hmm, looks like a sort of DRM-crippled Mediagora. (Crippled not only because users don't like DRM, but also because it doesn't allow people to remix freely.)

In their favour, though, they have actually implemented their system.

Posted by: colin_zr | Sep 30, 2003 1:33:35 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™