June Payroll data: "I have some good news and some bad news."

Friday, July 02, 2004 | 09:55 AM

Jobless numbers came in quite light this morning at 112,000 -- far below consensus estimates of 250,000. May Payrolls data was revised downwards, to +235k from a previous +248k.

This “Good News/Bad News” situation has several repercussions:

The good news is that the Fed policy of gradually removing their accommodation at the “measured” rate of ¼ point per meeting remains on track. That low cost of capital will continue stimulating the economy, albeit at a slower pace, than it has.

The bad news is that this data point, coming on top of weakening Durable Goods spending, downwardly revised Q1 GDP, slowing auto sales, and decreasing mortgage applications raise questions about the pace and even the sustainability of the expansion.

Note that the economy needs to add about 150,000 jobs per month just to keep up with the population growth of the labor pool. Thus, this recent data point means that the percentage of labor being utilized actually went down last month.

The impact of this data point puts us back on Payroll watch for at least another month. Is this way below consensus number an aberration of the prior 3 strong months, or are we seeing a reversal of the prior trend? One data point does not make a trend, but as it may signal a potential reversal, it is worth watching closely.

Lastly, consider the ongoing presidential election contest. Regardless of your personal preference, the markets have shown they have a clear preference for the incumbent over a challenger. We saw this during the March drop, as the incumbent’s approval numbers slid to their lows.

This data point places a yet another hurdle in front of the President’s re-election campaign. As we mentioned yesterday, the markets may actually -- for the first time in recent memory -- be paying attention to the Democratic Convention later this month. They will either try to become comfortable with the challenger as a likely successor, or in the event of a major gaffe, become less concerned about his potential for victory.

Stay tuned . . .

Friday, July 02, 2004 | 09:55 AM | Permalink | Comments (5) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference June Payroll data: "I have some good news and some bad news.":


I was under the impression the markets always perform better under democratic administrations versus republican administrations. At least, I have seen reports that this is the case.

If it is true markets perform better under democratic administrations, it appears it contradict your statement "...the markets have shown they have a clear preference for the incumbent over a challenger."

If both are true, then it would appear the markets favor an administration under which they will not perform as well.

Can you shed any light on this apparent contradiction?

PS: Sorry if this posted twice. I realized I had forgotten to close the ita;lics tag.

Posted by: adaplant | Jul 2, 2004 12:47:12 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™