Modern Art Market Superheats

Wednesday, March 02, 2005 | 09:10 AM

As I read this article, red lights and sirens started going off in my head. Why? I cannot possibly imagine that this sort of financial frenzy has any positive connotations for the equity markets:

"You want a Mehretu? A Hirst? A Koons? Fat chance. A much-watched lawsuit is exposing the painful truth of this overheated market: It takes more than money to buy a hot piece of art . . ."

"[A] courtroom battle has become an object of fascination in the art world. That may be because it reflects an increasingly common collector’s predicament—at its heart, it’s about someone’s being denied the opportunity to obtain what he can patently afford. The contemporary-art market hasn’t been this overheated since Soho circa 1989. Nowadays, hedge-fund billionaires who stroll into Chelsea galleries seeking work by Damien Hirst, Jeff Koons, or Cecily Brown quickly discover that money alone won’t help them get it. There is, more than ever, a waiting list, and more to the point, a pecking order within the list, which vaults some collectors above others.

When did collecting art become such a maddening exercise for wealthy collectors, akin to having to go before picky co-op boards only to be rejected over and over again? Even Rembrandt and Dürer had waiting lists. But “lists for younger artists are a much more recent phenomenon,” says Chelsea dealer Barbara Gladstone. “It’s a function of this excitable market.” People on Wall Street are seeking contemporary-art trophies—and waiting lists make works even more enticing to obtain. It sounds familiar, and naturally everyone wonders when this bubble will burst. Right now “feels like the last days of the Roman Empire,” says private-art curator Todd Levin. “Compared to the eighties, it’s a much broader group with much more money”—though some of the people are the same ones who bought art the last time around."

Why is this not a good thing? Three reasons:

1) Wanton disrespect for money as an asset class, as depicted by mad bidding wars for unknown artists, typically only occurs when there is too much of a good thing around; I.E., when the Fed has cranked up money supply (think M2); That condition gets easily rectified by the Fed merely turning the spigot off, which I suspect is 6 months to 1 year away; It takes a little less than a quarter (2 months or so) for weak money supply to be fely by the market  (See Mirror Image and Money Supply Peak discussions for more details);

2) Frenzied speculation in any significant market cannot be quarantined, as it is a condition of the mind, not the body. It has the disconcerting tendency to infect other markets;

3) Can a bifurcated economy the size of the United States continue indefinitely? Can Wal-Mart merely amble along, while -- at the same time --high end art dealers blow the roof off the dump? I'm not at all sure what the answer to this one is . . .

As to the timing, I would guess -- and its only a guess -- that we will be approaching an equity climax sometime over the next 1 to 3 quarters.

In the scheme of things, this ranks somewhere below the Time Magazine naming Amazon's Jeff Bezos its man of the year (late December 1999); The market peaked in March 2000.

What it will require is the speculation in other markets -- art, commodities,real estate -- to spill over into equities.

Make no mistake about this; It is a foreboding sign . . .   

UPDATE:  March 3, 2005, 10:13PM   

Just glanced at today's NYT. Page one story:  A New Prince of Wall Street Buys Up Art

Pretty timely, huh?

She Can't Be Bought
Christopher Mason
New York Magazine, March 7, 2005 issue

Wednesday, March 02, 2005 | 09:10 AM | Permalink | Comments (9) | TrackBack (3) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Modern Art Market Superheats:

» "Severe storm warning indicators" now flashing from chez Nadezhda
I follow the global capital markets broadly but not closely. Like the Brads (Setser and DeLong), [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 2, 2005 3:43:32 PM

» "Severe storm warning indicators" now flashing from chez Nadezhda
I follow the global capital markets broadly but not closely. Like the Brads (Setser and DeLong), [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 2, 2005 3:54:14 PM

» Housing as the New Paradigm Buster :) from Fester's Place
But both are saying the same thing --- by the time that people are recycling the language of newness and differentness, the phenomena is already old. [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 28, 2005 10:08:30 AM


another great indicator is the silly restaraunt indicator. In Seattle there is a huge increase in restaraunt openings. All are chic, over designed, feature goofy cuisine and overpriced wine and drinks. They typically have novice silent partners and make virtually no profit. They are spreading through town like a plague.

Posted by: rob | Mar 2, 2005 10:19:59 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™