Concert attendance and ticket pricing

Friday, May 20, 2005 | 07:07 AM

Although we sometimes lump them together, we really shouldn't:  The "Recording Industry" is a very different beast from the "Music Industry." One is relatively healthy, the other is in bad disrepair, primarily due to self-inflicted wounds and awful mismanagement over the years.  The latter is responsive, the former desperately stubborn.

The latest example: Concert attendance and ticket pricing:

"Many in the music business called 2004 the worst summer concert season in memory: fans were stuck with high prices and promoters lost money and canceled shows.

With this year's season about to kick off, event promoters and artist representatives have vowed to turn things around. So, they are offering a variety of inducements, including lower prices and offering more bands for the money by packaging big acts together at one show. Promoters are also blitzing fans with emails and text messages to try and generate interest in coming shows."

Wow. Where did they ever get the crazy idea that you could respond to decreasing demand for a product by lowering prices; Shouldn't they be conspiring to illegally fix prices, or lobbying Congress for some protective legislation?

This isn't saying that prcies have become cheap -- they are just lower than last year, by about 10%. "A big priority this year is making sure that the cheap seats are actually cheap. Last year, the inability to put fans in those back-of-the-house seats contributed mightily to a string of underperforming tours and concert cancellations. So this year, for example, the Eagles have aggressively promoted $25 seats at some stops on their coming tour; top-priced tickets are selling for $175."

The WSJ further notes that:

"Punk-pop trio Green Day -- one of the few young bands that can fill a stadium -- are seeing strong sales with ticket prices mostly held to less than $50. The Dave Matthews Band is charging less than $60 at most shows on its summer trek. Among the other big acts on the road this summer: Coldplay, Avril Lavigne, Nine Inch Nails and Alicia Keys.

The emphasis on affordable tickets is a big change from last season. Last year, according to Pollstar, a trade magazine that follows the concert business, the average ticket price for the 100 top-grossing tours hit a record high of $52.39, more than double the average seat in 1996. Even mediocre seats for acts like Van Halen and Cher were on sale for up to $80 a ticket. Unfortunately for the industry, the fans balked at the spiralling prices. Weak sales forced the cancellation of show by artists including Christina Aguilera and Marc Anthony."

Imagine that: Responding to your customers, pricing your product competitively, maximizing revenues. 

Where do these people ever get their wacky ideas from? Perhaps they accidentally stumbled across an Economic 101 textbook somewhere . . .

Summer Concerts Try New Tactics to Fill Seats
After a Dismal Last Season, Industry Lowers Some Prices;
Seeing the Eagles for $25
May 19, 2005; Page D1,,SB111646244383537628,00.html

Friday, May 20, 2005 | 07:07 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Concert attendance and ticket pricing:


As someone who once followed many bands across the country; I came to believe that there was no monitary value in the media versions of music (CD, tape, etc). The true value for most fans is in the concert. It appears that most people in my generation (X) and the one following (Y) think the same way.

Many musicians agree... just not the super-mega-stars who also typically have their own recording label. The majority of income for most musicians comes in live performances. I'm amazed more musicians don't give their music away for free. Imagine being able to download your favorite band's new album and burn it straight to CD (or DVD even). In the end, most artists don't make their money on music unless they sell more than a million... and at that point, wouldn't it be better to have 10 million people with a copy than just 1?

These people are going to come to your concert anyway, since you can't download the experience of seeing a show live. Why not save tons in production costs and simply release the music to the public. The more people you have listening, the more likely you are to sell out bigger shows.

Greater supply creating demand?

I think we're slowly getting there. I just wish that these music subscription services provided lossless quality audio and video. I'd also imagine that some giant decentralized network (BitTorrent-esque) may be an excellent way to go about this distribution.

Posted by: Chad K | May 20, 2005 1:56:56 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™