Net change in total liabilities
The previous discussion on Household Debt, based on St. Louis Fed's chart, generated a robust discussion in comments.
Lest anyone think that Fed office is playing with the data, here are some additional graphs, courtesy of BLS (the data only goes to 2003).
First, we took a look at the Net change in total liabilities, based on highest and lowest quintiles of income before taxes:
Highest 20 percent income quintile
The highest 5th saw their liabilities shoot up dramatically. This group, at $150k annual pre-tax income or greater, includes much of the mid-upper middle class, two income families, professionals, etc. This is the moderately well off suburban consumer, or the urban professional.
Their liabilities have skyrocketed only since 2001.
Lowest 20 percent income quintile
The lowest quintile has seen a gradual rise since 1984; They did see a burst since 2000, but not as severe as the highest 20%.
Note that Liabilities for the bottom 20% actually went down during the last few years of the prior expansion (my unsupported assumption is that this was due to increased income, as this group typically has only minor equity holdings).
Now lets look at the net change in total assets AND liabilities:
Lowest 20 percent income quintile
The wealth effect of the bubble apparently made everybody, at least temporarily, better off.
Highest 20 percent income quintile
Note the change in assets plus liabilities for the top 20% (~$150k per year). That's quite the negaitve change in financial circumstances.
Saturday, June 11, 2005 | 08:28 PM | Permalink
| Comments (4)
| TrackBack (0)
add to de.li.cious | digg this! | add to technorati | email this post
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d8347e6d4369e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Net change in total liabilities:
Comments
do you think these folks are buying 2ed houses etc? As a confused worker I haf to admit I dont care about mid-upper middle class.
Posted by: confused | Jun 11, 2005 10:43:52 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.