Even More LEI silliness
An emailer (who insists on anonymity) asks: "Aren't you done Bitch-slapping the Conference Board yet?"
Umm, no.
We've addressed this twice recently. Today, I'm going to hand the micropohone over to Bob Bronson, who makes an extremely compelling argument that we haven't highlighted the utter dishonest foolishness of what the Conference Board has wrought enough:
Without the revision eliminating the bearish impact of a narrowing yield curve the Conference Board's composite of leading economic indicators would have been down in July, rather than up a meager 0.1%.
But even with this revision, the other five leading economic indicators, which are coincident with the stock market, are below their highs oflast year and/or this year. Most significantly, they are rolling over again,as illustrated in the chart below.
Here's the chart:
click for enormously large chart
graphic courtesy of Bronson Capital Markets Research
>
Sources:
The Conference Board Removed the Bearish Impact of the Flattening Yield Curve From Their Leading Economic Indicators, But...
Bob Bronson
Bronson Capital Markets Research, August 2, 2005
http://www.financialsense.com/editorials/bronson/2005/0802.html
U.S. LEADING ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND RELATED COMPOSITE INDEXES FOR JUNE 2005
The Conference Board U.S. Business Cycle Indicators, 10:00 A.M. ET, THURSDAY, JULY 21, 2005
Conference Board Changes to LEI (PDF)
http://www.conference-board.org/economics/bci/RevisionsLEI_2005.pdf
Thursday, August 25, 2005 | 08:27 AM | Permalink
| Comments (1)
| TrackBack (0)
add to de.li.cious | digg this! | add to technorati | email this post
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d83489b16a69e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Even More LEI silliness:
Comments
What about the ECRI WLI that is showing a nice bullish run? Maybe the Conference Board is just trying to get their index to look like ECRIs. Give them some slack ! Everyone loves a bull.
Posted by: bigfoot | Aug 25, 2005 11:00:10 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.