Do Markets Care About Politics?

Friday, November 11, 2005 | 06:06 AM

On Wednesday night, Larry asked me what the 2005 elections might mean to the Markets; I think my answer surprised him a bit: If his pollster guests were correct, than the GOP might lose the House in 2006.

And the markets would like that.

Mind you, this isn't a GOP or a Dem thing; markets simply like divided governments. Even prefer it.

The reasons for this are pretty apparent:  A divided government -- different parties controlling the White House and one or both brannches of Congress -- has a very specific impact. It forces both parties to the center. It reduces excessive spending. Pork becomes a moderate expenditure, rather than the drunken spending spree its been as of late with GOP control. Vetoes are more likely. Tax policy tends to get frozen in place. Since ideology is neutered, any decreases in spending or increases in taxes are straight percentage changes across the boards. That's much easier to negotiate than trying to convince the other side their ideology is wrong while yours is correct. 

So I told him that if the GOP loses control of even one house, it might bode well for market performance. Unfortunately, that performance won't be until 2007 when they are sworn in, and maybe even 2008 when whatever new policies are enacted start to have an economic/market impact.

Recall that the Markets did extremely well under both Reagan and Clinton, who each had a Congress of the opposing party. Even the first President Bush saw the S&P500 rise more than 57% in his four years in office.


Reagan 1980-88
click for larger graphic


Clinton 1992 - 2000
click for larger graphic



Of course, Reagan was the first 40% of an 18 year Bull run, while Clinton was the last 40%. Same for Eisenhower's presidency -- his two terms (1952-60) were in the heart of the post-WWII rally, that ran from 1946-1966.

Here's the WSJ's take:

PRESIDENT BUSH'S approval rating, according to various opinion polls, has dropped in recent months, but the decline is just the tail end of a steady drop since a high point shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Note: Lines track positive answers to each poll's key question on presidential approval rating.

President Bush Approval Rating

click for larger graphic


Source: WSJ

Senate Races:  Battleground States

click for larger graphic


Source: WSJ


Friday, November 11, 2005 | 06:06 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Do Markets Care About Politics? :


Kudlow is a good example of that cliche: if all you have is a hammer everthing looks like nails.

"Karl Rove hasn't been indicted yet. Is that why the stock market went up?"

One-party rule is a disaster. Hope the dems can pull their act together. Hint: find more guys like Paul Hackett. You'll own the west and midwest.

Posted by: Brian | Nov 11, 2005 10:14:33 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™