The December Low Indicator: 10,717.50

Monday, January 23, 2006 | 06:03 AM

Dow Jones Industrial Average: December 2005
click for larger chart


Courtesy of Stock Charts


When the Dow closes below its December closing low in the first quarter, it is an excellent techncial  warning sign. The lowest actual closing price for the Dow Jones industrials in December was made on the very last trading day of the year -- 12/30/2005 at 10,717.50.

Closing price on Friday?  10,667.39

What's that mean for the market? Consider what the December low has meant in the past:

"The December Low Indicator was originated by Lucien Hooper, a Forbes columnist and Wall Street analyst back in the 1970s.

Hooper dismissed the importance of January and January’s first week as reliable indicators. He noted that the trend could be random or even manipulated during a holiday- shortened week. Instead, said Hooper, “Pay much more attention to the December low. If that low is violated during the first quarter of the New Year, watch out.”

The December low not being violated improves upon the January Barometer. If the December low is not crossed, than according to the stock trader's almanac, the January Barometer becomes virtually perfect, right nearly 100% of these times.”

-Stock Trader’s Almanac

In the past, when the December low has been violated in the past, at some point, markets have been down later that year every single time but one. The average drop is about 10.7%, but its been as small as 0.3%, and  as large as 25.1%.


click for larger table

via Stock Trader's Almanac


This should clarify the history somewhat . . . 


UPDATE: January 23, 2006 10:19pm

Here's what it looks like when the Dow does not violate its December low


Stock Trader's Almanac

Monday, January 23, 2006 | 06:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack (0) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The December Low Indicator: 10,717.50 :


correlate the negative years to those of secular bears and even GDP% and 'by eyeballing it' shows a deeper perspective.

Posted by: Dave | Jan 23, 2006 10:13:20 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™