Fed: Stagnant Net Worth for Typical US Family
Every 3 years, the Federal Reserve undertakes a massive survey of nearly 5,000 US families. The interview process is comprehensive, covering all manners of financial information -- and its intensive, taking between 80 minutes and 2 hours.
Its the Federal Reserve's Report on U.S. Family Finances, and it quantifies what most people already know: The average family is not making much economic progress:
"After growing rapidly during the boom of the 1990s, the net worth of the typical American family rose only 1.5% after inflation between 2001 and 2004, the Federal Reserve said in an update of a survey it does once every three years.
The Fed said the net worth of the median American family -- the one smack in the statistical middle -- was $93,100 in 2004. Net worth, the difference between a family's assets and liabilities, rose a robust 10.3% between 1998 and 2001 and 17.4% in the three-year interval before that.
A booming housing market boosted the typical American family's wealth between 2001 and 2004, but stagnant stock prices and rising debt offset many of those gains."
The Fed helps explain what many politicans have been unable to grasp: the disconnect between rosy economic headline data and real life experiences for most families.
The report also gives lie to much of the foolish spin we have heard from some politicians and from the economic charlatans -- those people who know better (or at least should know better), but knowingly deceive the public in pursuit of their own political or economic agenda.
A few items pop out from the report:
• Rising debt has offset the boom in housing;
• Inflation continues to eat into family cash flow;
• Income remains stagnant;
• Savings has slipped to zero;
click for larger graphic
courtesy of WSJ
>
And, its no surprise that the gap between economic strata has widened. This is part of the ongoing squeeze on the middle class:
"The report, the most comprehensive survey of household wealth, also found a widening of the gap between households at the top and the bottom of the economic ladder. "While the typical American household basically ran in place, less affluent households actually lost ground," said Stephen Brobeck, executive director of the Consumer Federation of America.
The net worth of the typical family in the richest 10% rose to $831,600, a 6.5% increase from 2001, adjusted for inflation. In contrast, the net worth of the typical family in the bottom 25% fell 1.5% to $13,300.
Meanwhile, the typical family took on more debt. After declining for years, mortgage and other debt as a percentage of total family assets rose to 15% in 2004 from 12.1%, the Fed said. "The largest part of that increase was attributable to debt secured by real estate," the report said. "As debt rose over the period, families devoted more of their incomes to servicing their debts, despite a general decline in interest rates."
All of the above has been very visible in the economic data, if you ignore the headlines and dig into thge underlying data: Job creation, income, inflation, debt, savings rate, foreclosure and bankruptcy.
Which ever political group figures this is the primary basis for the disconnect between the so called official data and the self reported economic concerns -- and responds to it -- stands to do well in the next election . . .
>
Source:
Typical U.S. Family's Net Worth Edged Up Only 1.5% in '01-'04
CHRISTOPHER CONKEY
WSJ, February 24, 2006; Page A4
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB114070076294181273.html
Recent Changes in U.S. Family Finances:
Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances
Brian K. Bucks, Arthur B. Kennickell, and Kevin B. Moore
Federal Reserve Board, Division of Research and Statistics
February 2006
http://federalreserve.gov/pubs/bulletin/2006/financesurvey.pdf
Friday, February 24, 2006 | 09:57 AM | Permalink
| Comments (27)
| TrackBack (5)
add to de.li.cious |
digg this! |
add to technorati |
email this post

TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d83426a94853ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Fed: Stagnant Net Worth for Typical US Family:
» Taxes: Fed; Stagnant Net Worth for Typical Family from School Information System
This site, along with many others includes discussion on public school finance. Public education money is currently generated from local property taxes, fees and redistributed state and federal funds (via income, energy and other taxes. Barry Ritholtz ... [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 25, 2006 9:19:25 AM
» Taxes; Fed: Stagnant Net Worth for Typical Family from School Information System
This site, along with many others includes discussion on public school finance. Public education money is currently generated from local property taxes, fees and redistributed state and federal funds (via income, energy and other taxes. Barry Ritholtz ... [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 25, 2006 12:19:31 PM
» Net Worth: For Average American Families, It's Stagnant from Sad Parade
In the last five years, the tax relief you passed has left $880 billion in the hands of American workers, investors, small businesses, and families -- and they have used it to help produce more than four years of uninterrupted [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 26, 2006 12:37:42 PM
» Net Worth: For Average American Family, It's Stagnant from Sad Parade
In the last five years, the tax relief you passed has left $880 billion in the hands of American workers, investors, small businesses, and families -- and they have used it to help produce more than four years of uninterrupted [Read More]
Tracked on Feb 26, 2006 12:39:38 PM
» Average Income of Americans Compared to Presidential Candidates from Prose Before Hos
Perhaps only one word can be used to describe all of the leading presidential contenders: multimillionaire.
Data
Rudy Giuliani - 40 Million Dollars
Mitt Romney - 100 Million Dollars*
Hillary Clinton - 51 Million Dollars
John McCain - 35 Million Dollar... [Read More]
Tracked on Jan 13, 2008 1:16:43 PM
Comments
Things aren't so good down here in the trenches.
Posted by: jim blackburn | Feb 24, 2006 11:01:43 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.