Historical Fed Fund Ranges

Wednesday, March 22, 2006 | 05:47 AM

As I have stated repeatedly, I do not buy this "One and Done" meme. This is the 3rd attempt at it -- the first being last June, when Dallas Fed Chair Fisher issued his now infamous 8th inning comments. Then in January, the moonshot was once again launched on that idea.

The most recent rally started last week ont he Medley advisors claim that it was One and Done (although that was subsequently revised to "maybe 1 or 2").

I find all these Fed Kremlinologists at to be junk analysis at best. My preference is for data and quantitative analysis.

With that in mind, I went to the St. Louis Fed site and downloaded all their Federal Funds Rate data. Here's a graphic depiction of what the median monthly historical rates look like:




This chart suggest that in order for Fed Funds to revert to the mean, the Federal Reserve Board has a ways to go -- both in rates and in time.

Note that we are now at 4.5%. Even if the Fed were to stand pat at 4.5%, the passage of time will move the 2000 - 2006 monthly median closer to the prior market periods median -- each passing month raises the median.


UPDATE: March 21, 2006 5:07pm

CB raises the question -- correctly -- that equating average funds rate is not sound given the difference in inflation; Low now, 10% then.

My response is that I believe inflation is much higher than the present CPI reflects; The key change in CPI construction was the owners equivalent rent, which we addressed repeatedly here. Without the 1983 owners equivalent rent adjustment, the CPI would be more like 5.3% -- not the 10+% of the 1970s, but certainly not the 1-2% its claimed to be at present.

Given the significance of housing to this economy -- and with Housing Affordability Index at 14 year lows -- its kinda silly to take CPI data seriously as a true measure of inflation.

UPDATE 2: March 22, 2006 6:07am

Rex Nutting makes an even better suggestion:  Apply the same analysis using real versus nominal Fed rates.

I'm not a huge fan of Boskin, PCE, or even the CPI for that matter -- I do not think they reflect inflation reality as experienced int he real world. But controlling for Real Fed Fund Rates (as opposed to nominal) may be more revealing than not controlling for inflation

The St.L Fed is such a pleasure to work with -- they give you all the data formatted in Excel already! Its intriguing -- let me see if I can find the Real Fed data in Excel (or pull it off of Bloomberg).

Wednesday, March 22, 2006 | 05:47 AM | Permalink | Comments (12) | TrackBack (1)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Historical Fed Fund Ranges:

» Real Fed Fund Rates from The Big Picture
Last week, we looked at the historical range of Federal Reserve Funds since 1946. It was a simple mean reversion, and did not incorporate the post WWII price controls, the 1970s inflation spike, or the Bretton Woods agreement. As such, some implied tha... [Read More]

Tracked on Mar 29, 2006 3:42:15 PM



The underweighting of the health care component is also a serious flaw. But there are so many flaws it's difficult to keeep track!

Posted by: Mark | Mar 22, 2006 7:00:13 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™