Hindenburg Omen ?

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 | 08:45 AM

I have no experience with the Hindenburg Omen, but from this chart, it hardly looks reliable.


Hidenburg


Its had some terrific calls -- 1987 in particular -- but lots of false positives also.


Does anyone have anymore specific experience with this indicator than I?  Please explain in the comments -- good, bad or indifferent.

UPDATE II May 1 2006 3:14pm 

Here's an analysis of the Hindenburg Omen by Kennedy Gammage; He gives it more credit than I do . . .

Download Hindenburg.pdf

Here

>

UPDATE April 25 2006 4:14pm

John Hussman discusses the prior Hindenburg Omens:

Hindenburgs:  "I've noted often that a great deal of the information conveyed by markets is contained in “divergences” between securities. While investors shouldn't read too much into any indicator, there's an interesting signal that has enough validity as a measure of divergence that it's worth mentioning here. Think of it as slightly more than entertainment value but far less than a reliable guide to investment.

The signal is based on new highs and new lows, and is cheerfully called a Hindenburg (the actual name given to it by Kennedy Gammage is the “Hindenburg Omen” but that strikes me as far too, well, ominous, because it's certainly not a sufficient condition for a market decline). It's a relatively unusual event that has often preceded fairly substantial market declines with a fairly short lead time (usually within 30-60 days, including declines in 1987, 1990, 1998, 2000 and 2001), but has sometimes proved to be meaningless or insignificant as well (such as a cluster of signals in September 2005, among others).

The basic elements are:

1) the market is in a rising trend, defined as the NYSE Composite being above its 10-week average;

2) both daily new highs and new lows exceed 2.2% of issues traded, and

3) the McClellan Oscillator is negative – meaning that market breadth as measured by advances and declines is relatively weak (there's some dispute, which I will not join, as to whether the Oscillator has to be negative that day or turn negative later). Peter Eliades added a couple of other conditions to eliminate signals occurring in clearly strong markets:

4) new highs can't exceed new lows by more than 2-to-1, and

5) 2 or more signals occur within about a month (he uses 36 days) of each other.

As it happens, we observed a Hindenburg on April 7th (just 2 days after the market high) and another one on April 10, so those elements seem to be in place here.


>

Source:
The April 2006 Hindenburg Omen Has Now Been Confirmed
Robert McHugh
Monday, April 24, 2006 7:20 GMT
http://futures.fxstreet.com/Futures/content/100480/content.asp?menu=review

Main Line Investors
http://www.technicalindicatorindex.com

Tuesday, April 25, 2006 | 08:45 AM | Permalink | Comments (23) | TrackBack (1)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d834bc543769e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hindenburg Omen ?:

» Hindenburg Omen: Doom? from xml.metafilter.com
Stock Market on Crash Watch due to a Hindenburg Omen . More info on a Hindenburg Omen. Even More info [Read More]

Tracked on Jul 7, 2008 9:32:18 AM

Comments

That agrees with my take on the Hindenurg Omen.

I took a look at McHugh's stuff via a free 30-day subscription, and much of it seems like numerology. Each of his reports ends with "Caution is warranted." Doh!

I'm also put off by the Biblical quote that ends each of his reports. When it comes to markets and those who cover them I want skepticism, not faith.

But he may have a good handle on the manipulation of the market by the Plunge Protection Team through massive buying of calls which triggers short-covering rallies.

Posted by: anonimouse | Apr 25, 2006 9:03:17 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner