Sometimes, they just want to take 'em higher: PPI versus CPI

Wednesday, August 16, 2006 | 06:55 AM

“In terms of what it actually tells us about overall inflation, I’m not sure it’s all that important.”
-Jan Hatzius, chief United States economist at Goldman Sachs.

“It looks to us like this is a fluke.” 
-Ethan Harris, chief United States economist at Lehman Brothers

>

Sometimes, they just want to take 'em higher, and yesterday was a classic example of that.

Don't believe the hype that it was based on the PPI; Any excuse would have lit the fuse, as sentiment had gotten a bit too extreme, and the market was simply due for a pop. That's what yesterday's move looked like. For you EMH adherents out there, both Goldman (equities) and Lehman (bonds) prominently pointed out to their clients all the warts in the PPI data -- so this was hardly a secret.

As I stated last week in a note to RR&A subscribers, "If you are a Trader, Cisco's good numbers and guidance might drive equities higher today -- if the markets can develop some momentum, a summer rally is possible."

As we discussed extensively yesterday, the soft PPI was a function of heavy discounting by GM, Chrysler, and Ford on SUVs and light trucks. How much discounting?  Bloomberg, citing data from Edmunds, noted the following:

"Edmunds's data show automakers' total discount spending rose 15 percent to $4.5 billion last month from June. DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler unit, whose July sales fell 37 percent, this month extended employee discounts for all buyers of its cars and trucks through August."

There's your entire decline in producer prices: almost $5 Billion dollars in July incentives to move heavy iron off of dealer lots.

At the same time as car dealers were engaging in big price cutting, Bloomberg reported that:

"Price pressures for raw materials continue to build. Core prices for goods at the earliest stage of the production process rose at an annual rate of 43 percent over the last three months. Core prices for intermediate goods rose at an 11 percent pace since May. Profits may suffer if companies can't pass rising raw material and labor costs on to consumers."
(emphasis added)

You read that correct: The past quarter's data shows raw materials rose at an annualized rate of 43%.  (But no worries, there is no inflation in the core . . .  Ha!).

So where does that leave us today?

CPI at 8:30 will likely show much more inflation than yesterday's PPI headline. Since the market chose to ignore the actual basis for the dis-inflation, today may very much be a tell: If the number comes in hot, and they rally them anyway, look for OER to become  the excuse. But the reality is its an options expiration week, and they have higher prices on their collective minds.

If the data comes in cool, all bets are off on the height of the moonshot.

Sometimes, the data is irrelevant -- to paraphrase Thin Lizzy, "When the boys want to play, you better let them."


>


Sources:
Stocks Rally as Inflation Eases Off
JEREMY W. PETERS
NYTimes,  August 16, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/16/business/16econ.html

U.S. Economy: Producer Prices Unexpectedly Decline (Update7)
Joe Richter
Bloomberg.net: August 15, 2006 15:51 EDT
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aRGNBFVjcMWM&

Wednesday, August 16, 2006 | 06:55 AM | Permalink | Comments (30) | TrackBack (1)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d8342b4ec753ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Sometimes, they just want to take 'em higher: PPI versus CPI:

» Why The CPI Nnumbers Were Irrelevant (This Time) from At These Levels
The numbers are irrelevant if their spin fits the agenda (exiration). [Read More]

Tracked on Aug 16, 2006 4:43:42 PM

Comments

Fascinating Barry.

Last month you were very excited about a strong CPI number...a coincident lagging indicator. I'll be watching if it gets the same brush stroke by you this AM, now that it shows a stabilization.

As I said last month, I'm more interested in the leading inflation and growth numbers. I believe BB is as well. FIG is not (yet) a clear case win for bulls...but these coincident indicators will curve the perception that inflation is under control.

Posted by: ss | Aug 16, 2006 8:59:01 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner