A few thoughts on Microcaps

Friday, September 08, 2006 | 02:34 PM

NOTE:  This Trading alert was originally posted at Ritholtz Research & Analytics on FRI 9/8/2006 3:00 PM EDT by email.

This is posted here not as investing advice, but rather as an example of a trading call for potential subscribers. We expect to post future advisories in a similar manner -- after the call, but in the correct chronological location on the blog.


Q. You mentioned Micro-caps recently -- Why? Some time ago you showed a chart showing that the market is shifting to big caps from small caps – why even look at smaller capitalization stocks?

A. I look at Micro-caps for a few reasons: 1) They are not well covered by Wall Street, and therefore opportunity exists; 2) They offer large potential upside; 3) I have had some pretty good luck with them over the past 10 years.

My prior mention of Micro-caps generated a surprisingly large response; This alone makes me nervous. Since subscribers have insisted, I am sending out these details about the pros and cons of these speculative issues.

There are a few small caps I am watching, and a couple I already own. Depending upon how these develop, I may end up recommending these --  HOWEVER: 

As a rule, I do not particularly like Micro-caps. They tend to be too thinly traded. They very often do not comply with reporting rules or Sarbanes-Oxley. They are heavily promoted, by both paid IR people and other less savory characters. My general take has been that outlandish percentage of micro-cap situations will eventually go to zero.

But as I mentioned last time, I’ve had a pretty good run with a handful of these. In particular, I like special situations. I want a good combination of factors – I look for insider ownership, strong intellectual property and a good patent portfolio, clean reporting, strong management and most important of all, a positive catalyst – a good story that can flower into a great stock.These incidences are exceedingly rare. Because of that infrequency, I have developed caveats about speculating in these companies:

1) Think of them as STUBS – an option that doesn’t expire. That means you only purchase in smaller lots than your stock buys. If you typically buy equities in $50k blocks, then you would only buy $5-10k worth; If its $10k, then you buy $1-2k.

2) Due to the combination of low prices and high volatility, stop losses do not really work on these. Swings up and down tend to stop you out prematurely. Without a stop loss, it is my working assumption that my purchase will get cut in half; Therefore, I only buy smaller amounts.

3) I would rather average up – buying more when the stock is working – than average down. I hate to add to losing positions;

With those caveats in place, here is a discussion of some winners and losers I have had in this micro-cap space. These are simply war stories to give you an idea of how these can trade. I’ve never put together an audited track record of my special situations buys – I’ve had plenty of losers to go along with my winners.

Even the micro-cap big winners have had dangerous track records. These are not recommendations, they are war stories:

Visual Data (VDAT):  In the late 90s, dot com madness, a firm I worked at had a banking relationship with Visual Data; The firm had an online library of videos; They were tryinjg to commercialize the space long before broadband.

The stock was stuck under $2; I discovered a prior convertible offering that kept issuing stock any time it got neat $2. I proposed the firm raise $3m to buy out the convert holders – thinking the stock could go to $3 or $4. It went to $46, and then back down to $1. Yes, lots of people made lots of money – and then gave much of it back.

NX Networks (NTRX) – another late 90s round trip success story. At the height of the internet, with Sycamore and Juniper chasing Cisco, this networker ran from under $2 to $30 – and then back down to zero.

Ampex (AMPX) the company that invented the VCR, had a big portfiolio of technology patents. They proved to a court that the digital cameras essentially used the same technology that put images on tape. The stock was about $5 when the first major settlement was announced, and on that news, I was a buyer between $5- $15. The stock subsequently ran up to ~$55 – before plummeting back to $16.

Burst (BRST) Long story short: I looked over this tech company as a favor to a friend (who owned too much too high) when its stock was in free fall in 2000. Bottom line: Loved the technology, hated the management. I told the founder to fire the CEO, get a new business model, and BTW, everyone is stealing your IP. I joined the Board of Directors when the stock was 3 cents, and helped to convince the firm to pursue a patent claim against Microsoft. The settlement in 2005 was for $60 million. The stock ran to over $3. The company issued a one time special dividend of ninety cents. It’s about a $1 and change today.


Those four were the winners – and in every instance, the stock eventually came down precipitously. Microcap losers look the same – they go pretty close to zero – only with out the spectacular run up first.

Final thoughts:

When I do make a micro-cap recommendation, my disclosures will include the following:

Ownership: If a special situation comes along, I expect to 1) own it personally; 2) own it in managed accounts I run; 3) own it in the fund. Yes, we eat our own cooking around here.

Pay for Play: Never. It may be borderline legal, but its totally unethical in my book. I had a boss some years ago who was dying to capture $25k plus in fees for each report he wanted me to write (I refused, and then quit a few weeks later). I thought the guy was a criminal – and from what I hear, he’s under NASD/SEC investigation. Can’t say I’m surprised.

More next week -- including the macro housing piece I promised a week ago . . .

-Barry Ritholtz
September 8, 2006

Friday, September 08, 2006 | 02:34 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A few thoughts on Microcaps:


The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™