The Odd Recovery

Saturday, September 02, 2006 | 09:32 AM


graphic courtesy of NYT


Is this recovery one of the best or one of the worst in the post-World War II era?

That's the question great Floyd Norris asks in a column in today's NYT.

With the unemployment rate down to 4.7 percent, this recovery is 2nd only to one previous cycle (1965) for the lowest post-recession unemployment rates. Norris notes:

"The low unemployment rate has come about despite a slow rate of job creation. At this point after the previous nine recessions, there were an average of 11.9 percent more jobs in the economy than there had been at the end of the recession."

We've discussed the reasons for why we have such low Unemployment -- people dropping out of the Labor force (NILFs) -- in the past. And that's before we even get to the marginally attached workers (see Rosy Jobs Rate Has Thorny Underside). The column directly refers to these NiLFs:

"The decline in the unemployment rate reflects the fact that fewer of those without jobs say they are looking for work, as is required to be counted as unemployed."

We also know that buried in the Household Survey (which measuress unemployment) is one of our all-time favorite fibs, the Self-Employed Work-at-Home Contractor. Technically, these people are counted as employed in the Household Survey, but we know the vast majority of them are merely saving face, claiming to be working -- but hardly are.   

Its not just the unemployment picture that is so unusual. On top of the low unemployment levels, this recovery has created surprisingly few new jobs. As Norris notes:

"So far, there are just 3.5 percent more jobs than at the end of the last recession. That is less than half the lowest of the nine previous moves — a gain of 7.6 percent in the period after the 1953-54 recession. And that figure was held down by the fact that another recession, in 1957-58, had taken place by then."

By any measure, this recovery has created the fewest jobs of any post WWII recession recovery cycle. And as we have said too many times to count, its becasuse the frame of reference most economists use is wrong.

This isn't a typical post WWII recession recovery -- this is a post-Crash recovery.  They are fewer in number and dramatically more severe than most people realize. 


The Odd Recovery: Unemployment Is Low and So Is Employment
NYT, September 2, 2006

Saturday, September 02, 2006 | 09:32 AM | Permalink | Comments (33) | TrackBack (0) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Odd Recovery:


"[T]his recovery has created surprisingly few new jobs."


This recovery has created surprisingly few new jobs for workers in the US.

Posted by: Robert Coté | Sep 2, 2006 10:16:01 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™