NAR's Existing Home Sales & Prices

Tuesday, November 28, 2006 | 01:19 PM

Its "Trash a Trade-Group's Spin" day here at the Big Picture. After this morning's look at the National Retail Federation's nonsense, we might as well have a go at this morning's enzyme-free donkey fazoo from the National Association of Realtors.

The data:  Existing Home Sales & Prices

The spin?  Let's have a look at what the friendly agents at NAR had to say:

David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, said market fundamentals are improving. 

"The present level of home sales demonstrates some confidence in the market, but sales are lower than sustainable due to psychological factors"

“The annual decline in the October median home price is skewed because there was an uncharacteristic spike in October 2005, but the trend for the fourth quarter will be prices remaining slightly below a year ago.       

Fundamental's are improving? Well, the freefall in unit sales stopped -- thanks to a record drop in prices:

"The median home price was $221,000 in October, compared with a revised $221,000 in September and $229,000 in October 2005. It was the largest year-to-year decline ever and a record third consecutive decrease, NAR said." (emphasis added)

Somehow, Lereah overlooked the small issue that October's 3.5% decline in the national median existing home price follows September's 1.8% year-on-year decline. (Whoops! I'm sure he'll follow up on that next month).

How common is this annual fall? CNN/Money noted:

"While month-to-month declines in home prices are not uncommon, year-to-year drops had been rare before the recent housing slump. Last August was the first month in 11 years to see such a decline."

Let's move on to Confidence -- is it really returning? Certainly not based on the increase in inventory:

"Inventories nationally increased 1.9% at the end of October to 3.85 million units. That represents a 7.4 month supply at the current pace of sales."

Hmmm, how about that unusual spike in 2005 which skewed the data? Let's have a closer look at that, and see how unusual it realy is. We go to Kevin DePew at Minyanville, who is on the case:

"Lereah claims the October decline in national median prices is "skewed" due to "an uncharacteristic spike in October of last year. Sure enough, in October 2005, the national median price jumped 16.6% year-on-year, which followed September's 13.4% year-on-year jump, which followed followed August's 15.8% jump, which followed July's 14.1% jump, which... wait a minute... followed... STOP IT!  That's not an uncharacteristic spike.  That's a freaking TREND!"

Finally, I am not sure just what it means to say that "sales are lower than sustainable due to psychological factors." My best guess is that's a polite way to say: "You want howe much for that house? What are you f%$#@ crazy?"

Bottom line: Investors need to look at data sources very very carefully before relying on them -- this is especially true when the  source is a trade group, who tend to be non-objective, and indeed have a very specific agenda that benefits from happy talk. In the present case, a strong motivation for transactional business.



>




Sources: 
Existing Home Sales Rise in October, Market Stabilizing
NAR, November 28, 2006
http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/
2006/ehs_oct06_existing_home_sales_stabilizing.html

Existing-Home Sales Climb, But Prices Show Record Drop
JEFF BATER
November 28, 2006 10:14 a.m.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB116471970158834473.html

Home prices post record drop in October
Chris Isidore
CNNMoney.com, November 28 2006: 10:56 AM EST
http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/28/news/economy/
homesales/index.htm?postversion=2006112810

Tuesday, November 28, 2006 | 01:19 PM | Permalink | Comments (41) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00d834ccff9a53ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference NAR's Existing Home Sales & Prices:

Comments

Not because of Barry, but because I see David Lereah a couple lines down, I don't even bother to read the rest of this thread.

The bottom line is always the same - he's full of sh*t.

Posted by: Michael C. | Nov 28, 2006 2:00:05 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner