Microsoft Search Request: Is Google a Monopoly?

Monday, June 25, 2007 | 08:06 AM

Microsoft has filed a complaint about Google's purchase of Double-Click.

(I have to let that sink in a moment . . . O.K., stop snickering).

There's something deliciously ironic about the largest recently adjudicated monopolist accusing Google of monopoly abuse -- even as Microsoft itself is forced to withdraw their own attempt to hijack desktop search through their own monopoly!

But is Google a monopoly, given its domination of search, 64% market share, and 58% year over year growth of total number of search queries?


• Google neither owns the content nor the delivery mechanism of that content.

• Google has no geographical control anywhere in the world.

• Since nearly all its consumer services are free, Google doesn't have the power to raise prices.

• Google has no ability to exclude competitors or somehow block access to competing services

• Google operates in an environment of healthy competition, with deep pocketed comeptitors such as Microsoft, Yahoo, and

Google's succes is simply a function of it building a better mousetrap. 

The complaining you hear comes from competitors who simply missed the boat. Had Microsoft or Yahoo! understood the revenue potential of serving ads with each search, Google would not be the benevolent monster it is today.

So instead, we get anit-trust whining from the world's biggest "innovator."

Terry Semel got $h*tcanned for frittering away Yahoo's dominant position in both search (are portal's far behind?)

With Semel gone -- Non-executive Chairman is a polite term for one foot out the door -- inquiring minds want to know: Is Ballmer next?


Is Google a Monopoly?
Lance Ulanoff
PC Mag, 05.09.07,1759,2127299,00.asp

Monday, June 25, 2007 | 08:06 AM | Permalink | Comments (23) | TrackBack (0) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Microsoft Search Request: Is Google a Monopoly?:


Google is a monopoly in one area through rates. No one is in ANY position to compete with them in that area. Google maintains several office buildings where people do nothing but click through ads...thus inflating the value of each and every potential ad placement.

I actually agree that Google should not have this much power for the simple reason that we do not need another microsoft type of no choice going forward.


BR: Michael, this is ridiculous . . .

I am unpublishing the rest of the thread

Posted by: michael schumacher | Jun 25, 2007 9:45:38 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™