Real Income Fails to Rise for most of the 2000s

Tuesday, August 21, 2007 | 07:03 AM

20070821_tax_graphic I've been talking about this for years, but I am glad to see quantifiable proof has now been adduced. According to IRS data:

"Americans earned a smaller average income in 2005 than in 2000, the fifth consecutive year that they had to make ends meet with less money than at the peak of the last economic expansion, new government data shows.

While incomes have been on the rise since 2002, the average income in 2005 was $55,238, still nearly 1 percent less than the $55,714 in 2000, after adjusting for inflation, analysis of new tax statistics show.

The combined income of all Americans in 2005 was slightly larger than it was in 2000, but because more people were dividing up the national income pie, the average remained smaller. Total adjusted gross income in 2005 was $7.43 trillion, up 3.1 percent from 2000 and 5.8 percent from 2004. . ."

Incidentally, the lack of real income growth was calculated using BLS data measures of CPI. It’s even worse than this in reality, as we have long demonstrated that CPI does not accurately measure inflation.  So the true, after inflation, "Real Income,"  is actually far, far worse. 

Perhaps this explains why 2/3rds of the people interviewed in a WSJ/NBC survey believe that we are either in a recession or will be within a year . . .

Also no secret: Income growth has been concentrated in the highest few percentile:

"The growth in total incomes was concentrated among those making more than $1 million. The number of such taxpayers grew by more than 26 percent, to 303,817 in 2005, from 239,685 in 2000. These individuals, who constitute less than a quarter of 1 percent of all taxpayers, reaped almost 47 percent of the total income gains in 2005, compared with 2000.

People with incomes of more than a million dollars also received 62 percent of the savings from the reduced tax rates on long-term capital gains and dividends that President Bush signed into law in 2003, according to a separate analysis by Citizens for Tax Justice, a group that points out policies that it says favor the rich.

The group’s calculations showed that 28 percent of the investment tax cut savings went to just 11,433 of the 134 million taxpayers, those who made $10 million or more, saving them almost $1.9 million each. Over all, this small number of wealthy Americans saved $21.7 billion in taxes on their investment income as a result of the tax-cut law."

So long as we are popping economic myths, let's also dispatch with the 4.5% unemployment rate. That number has been largely caused by several million exhaustees and others simply leaving the work force:


The actual unemployment rate is closer to 6.5%. And if we measured it the way the Europeans do, its closer to 8%. This explains why wages and labor costs have remained subdued despite the alleged 4.5% UE measure.

Anyone with more than 4 functioning brain cells should be able to figure out that a 4.5% unemployment rate would be causing huge labor shortages and wage increases.

Instead, the average income gain is merely a measure of inflation: reported gains reflect increased costs for medical care -- the exact same coverage (but with a higher copay) which costs 15% more year-over-year shows up as increased total wages.   

You may now return to your previously scheduled economic propaganda 


Average Incomes Fell for Most in 2000-05
NYT, August 21, 2007

America's Economic Mood: Gloomy
WSJ, August 2, 2007; Page A4

Study #6074 (PDF)
NBC News/Wall Street Journal
July 2007

Tuesday, August 21, 2007 | 07:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (88) | TrackBack (1) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Real Income Fails to Rise for most of the 2000s:

» There has been no income growth since 2000, and our unemployment numbers are all lies from discarded lies - hyperlinkopotamus
There has been no income growth since 2000, and our unemployment numbers are all lies [Read More]

Tracked on Sep 1, 2007 12:38:15 AM


Funny, we hear a lot about immigration in the media today, but not in this article. . . in fact not even one mention.

Furthermore - the article is very concerned with the population of people making over $100K - but, doesn't mention whether 2000 to 2005 was above or below average in immigration (legal or otherwise).

I'm a bit of bush apologist, so take my word with a grain of salt - but, it is rather odd that the article makes absolutely no mention of immigration.

Posted by: critical thought | Aug 21, 2007 7:55:08 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™