Merrill vs Bear: Two Contestants, No Winners

Friday, January 04, 2008 | 11:30 AM

You may have overlooked this short but fascinating column in Bloomberg yesterday:

"Merrill Lynch, founded in 1914, sold hundreds of millions of dollars worth of collateralized debt obligations to hedge funds run by Bear Stearns, started in 1923.

Some 90 percent of the face value of the CDOs was loaned to Bear by Merrill, as is normal in such transactions. When the prices of the funds' CDO holdings started to fall in June, Merrill demanded that the firm increase collateral in what's known in the debt markets as a margin call.

Bear Stearns executives pleaded for time, arguing that the forced sale of their assets would push down all CDO prices. Merrill Lynch officials brushed off the entreaty, according to people involved in the discussions.

In June, the hedge funds, run by Ralph Cioffi, sold $3.8 billion of CDOs to meet margin calls by Merrill and other lenders that were following its lead. The fire sale led to a further drop in CDO prices."

Now, that's a pretty straight forward tale of a creditor pressing a debtor for additional (contractually required) collateral. The sale actually caused a "Mark-to-market" event that forced actual (versus modeled) pricing to occur.

But what makes this tale so unusual is the sprawling nature of the big Wall Street supermarkets investment banks: It turns out that of the many companies affected by this market pricing, one of them turns out to be Merrill:

"Among those that lost value: $23 billion of CDOs Merrill held on its own books. In October, Merrill wrote down the value of all of its mortgage-backed holdings, including CDOs, by $7.9 billion and declared a loss for the third quarter."

Ouch.

But it was inevitable: The more diversified each firm becomes as they expand, the more the entire financial ecosystem looks like one giant iBank.

Expect to see more of this sort of thing in the future . . .


>

Source:
In Unforgiven Margin Call, Bear Funds Failed on Merrill CDOs 
Yalman Onaran
Bloomberg, Jan. 3 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aT2LrbPYb7wU
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aT2LrbPYb7wU&

Friday, January 04, 2008 | 11:30 AM | Permalink | Comments (13) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00e54fbf7e1d8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Merrill vs Bear: Two Contestants, No Winners:

Comments

Luckily, when the "hamburgler" was on yesterday, I caught that when I was on bloomberg.

Posted by: Eric Davis | Jan 4, 2008 12:10:40 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner