New Column up at TheStreet.com (01/03/08)

Thursday, January 03, 2008 | 10:00 AM

RealMoneyThe new Real Money column mentioned yesterday has been moved to the free TheStreet.com site.

For some reason, its been retitled: 13 Things You Wish You'd Known in 2007. I much prefer the educational spin of yesterday's title, Lessons From 2007: A Baker's Dozen, although I have to admit its kinda clunky as far as titles go.

I listed the 13 bullet points yesterday, here's a flavor of two of them -- one technical, one fundamental:

 

4. Day-to-day stock action is mostly noise:

This is blasphemy to some people, but it's true. Markets eventually get pricing right, but the key to understanding this is the word "eventually."

Over the shorter term, markets frequently under- or overprice a stock before settling into the right approximation of value. This process typically occurs over broad lengths of time. Unfortunately, that doesn't stop some rather suspect interpretations of what these short-term movements mean. I look at these tea readings as Rorschach tests, revealing more about the speaker than they do about the subject.

Case in point: the homebuilders. It seemed that every time there was even the slightest uptick in the group, some bozo would declare that the bottom of the real estate cycle was in. Indeed, every dead-cat bounce or short squeeze was trotted out as proof positive that the housing problem was over. Only it wasn't, and the homebuilders cratered some 70% off their highs. You don't need to be a technician to know this: The little squiggles on the chart mean a whole lot less than the big squiggles do."

5. P/E matters less than you think:

One of the things I heard a lot this year was "I (dis)like this stock because it has a (high)low P/E." News flash: P/E ratios alone tell you very little about a stock's future prospects.
If that sounds like blasphemy, please look at a few examples: Google, Apple and Mosaic (MOS) all sported high P/Es at the beginning of the year. Their stocks have done splendidly. On the other hand, back in January, retailers, financials and homebuilders all had reasonably cheap P/Es. (How'd they do?)

It helps if you think of P/Es not as a photo but as video. The direction matters more than the mere number: Were P/Es likely to come down as sales ramped up? Or were P/Es modest because they were at the top of a profit cycle, and were likely to fall? The answer to these questions explains the difference between the winners and losers.

The rest of the column is filled with other such wit and wisdom . . .

>



Source:

13 Things You Wish You'd Known in 2007
Barry Ritholtz
TheStreet.com,  1/2/2008 2:11 PM EST    http://www.thestreet.com/s/13-things-you-wish-youd-known-in-2007/newsanalysis/investing/10396669.html

Thursday, January 03, 2008 | 10:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (10) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00e54fbdff308833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference New Column up at TheStreet.com (01/03/08):

Comments

OT:

ECB commenting on it's M3 supply increase and the problems of a lowering bias:

ECB said Thursday that annual money-supply growth was unchanged in November at the previous month's record of 12.3%. But the more closely watched three-month moving average, which irons out some of the monthly fluctuations, expanded at an annual rate of 11.9% in the September-November period compared to the August-October increase of 11.7%.
Those rates tower over the 4.5% reference target for the three-month moving average of M3 that the ECB considers compatible with price stability.
"Continued double-digit money supply and bank lending growth rates are clearly an obstacle to lower ECB policy rates," said BNP Paribas chief euro-zone economist Ken Wattret.
For the ECB, it means that its effort to steer inflation back down to its policy goal of just below 2% might be hard without some radical monetary tightening.

You can bet that our M3 (no longer published IMO) is MUCH HIGHER.

Ciao
MS

Posted by: michael schumacher | Jan 3, 2008 10:08:00 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner