Overstated Job Growth & the Annual Establishment Survey Benchmarking

Thursday, January 31, 2008 | 08:30 PM

Tomorrow, we find out just how much the B/D adjustment overstated true job creation in 2007. Every year, the Annual CES benchmark revisions are published in the February NFP. It has all the makings of a potential disaster.

To quote the BLS:

Benchmark revisions reflect a re-anchoring of CES sample-based estimates to incorporate near universe counts of employment. These comprehensive counts of employment, or benchmarks, are derived primarily from employment counts reported on unemployment insurance (UI) tax reports that nearly all employers are required to file with State Workforce Agencies.

In other words, the hypothetical Birth Death adjustments should have no impact. 

Here's Floyd Norris' take on other, recent, BLS adjustments:

"The American economy appears to have created far fewer jobs this spring than has been reported so far, a new government report indicated yesterday. That could provide further impetus for the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates when it meets Dec. 11.

The report included a sharp downward revision of the government’s estimate of personal income growth for the second quarter. Because the changes were made as soon as better employment figures were available, the revisions made it seem likely that figures on job creation are also likely to be revised downward in coming months.

The new report concluded that personal income from wages and salaries grew at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in the second quarter, far below the 4.5 percent that had previously been estimated."

Note that the personal income data are based in part on BLS Establishment Survey. This income statistics revision implies that tomorrows benchmark revision of NFP may be quite substantial.


Tomorrow, we'll look into January's shocker of a B/D adjustment -- invariably negative due to holidays . . .


Estimates May Have Overstated Job Growth   
NYT, December 1, 2007

Technical information: Revisions to CES data for late sample reports, annual benchmarking, and other factors

Thursday, January 31, 2008 | 08:30 PM | Permalink | Comments (22) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Overstated Job Growth & the Annual Establishment Survey Benchmarking:


I don't trust the BLS one damn bit. Perhaps overly cynical, probably not. Even though the B/D model has contributed the overwhelming majority of the ENTIRE job growth over the past month, ludicrous...still I am expecting them to show none, zero, nil adjustment and 100,000+ jobs for January. I won't believe one bit of it, but as usual, they are the official figures and the media will run with them like NO tomorrow. Hey, after-all, if they're official they have to be correct. Kudlow will be impossible to bear tomorrow afternoon. In fact, CNBC will be impossible to bear. Hope I am wrong, but wait for it..

Posted by: Stuart | Jan 31, 2008 8:53:01 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™