Review: WSJ 2007 Forecasts
>
Last year, I participated in the WSJ forecasts. Given the typical Wall Street cheerleading, I (per usual) was the most bearish person on the list.
As chance would have it, our forecasts were eerily accurate. Here are the forecasts from 2007 and the actual year end numbers:
2007 Forecasts
DJIA: 13250;
S&P 500: 1475
Nasdaq: 2650;
Russell 2000: 825
10-year yield: 3.95%
2007 Actual
DJIA: 13264.82
S&P 500: 1468.36
Nasdaq: 2652.28
Russell 2000: 766.03
10-year yield: 4.03 %
As I said, it is mostly dumb luck as to the final numbers.
>
See also From Worst to First Second: Business Week Forecast 2007
>
Sources:
Separating The Seers From The Seersuckers
By SPENCER JAKAB
A Dow Jones Newswires Column
http://www.djtopstories.com/article/0,,SB119946223624826214,00.html
Monday, January 07, 2008 | 12:00 PM | Permalink
| Comments (17)
| TrackBack (1)
add to de.li.cious |
digg this! |
add to technorati |
email this post

TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00e54fbcbfd78834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Review: WSJ 2007 Forecasts:
» Media Appearance: CNBC's Squawk on the Street (1/10/08) from The Big Picture
This morning, I am on CNBC's Squawk on the Street, at 10;40am. Today's appearance is courtesy of our winning forecast in the WSJ 2007 contest, which was described as eerily close to the final tally. As I have said many times, these contests come down t... [Read More]
Tracked on Jan 10, 2008 9:45:57 AM
Comments
So, when do we get a prediction for 2008?
Posted by: Andrew | Jan 7, 2008 12:30:13 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Having done these forecasts for a few years now, watching the outcome over the final few days of the year reminds one how near totally random the final outcome is. As the final few days go by, the leaderboard changes day to day, almost arbitrarily. In golf, its mostly skill (with a little luck). Here that formula is reversed — a little skill keeps you in the game, but the final outcome is based on chance.
Several commentators made observations regarding these results. Here's some very kind words via Dow Jones: