Global Financial Crises, Part II: Norway 1987

Sunday, February 10, 2008 | 07:33 AM

Yesterday, we looked at 5 Historical Economic Crises and the USA.

Neg_ratesThat discussion led to a reader in Norway referring us to this 2005 commentary about the Norwegian Financial Crisis, which began circa 1987. It was the first systemic crisis in a major industrialized country since the 1930s.

As the nearby chart shows, Real Interest rates in Norway were negative from 1980-84. The crisis hit five years later.

In the United States, real interest rates were negative between 2002-03. The crisis hit five years later. (Real Interest rates just flipped negative again in 2008).

The Norwegian banking crisis had several features which will look familiar to any observer considering the present deterioration of the US financial situation. Both can be described as classic boom-bust crises, containing several universal features:

Long Island Financial Iced Tea

• Deregulation and liberalization paved the way for the boom
• Macroeconomic policies were largely pro-cyclical
• Lending growth became exceptionally strong
• Prudential capital regulations were relaxed
• Regulatory/Supervision efforts were reduced

The author notes these five factors was "a deadly cocktail." We seem to have drunk the same heady and dangerous brew here in the US. I call it a Long Island Financial Iced Tea -- five liquors mixed with reckless abandon, invariably producing a pounding hangover.

I suspect where there will be significant differences in the manner of how the two crisises will be resolved. The Norwegian crisis resolution contained five features:

Norwegian Hangover Cure

• Private solutions were explored before the government intervened.
• Share capital was written down to zero before committing public funds.
• The government acted swiftly to limit contagion, but did not provide a blanket guarantee.
• Liquidity support was given to illiquid, but solvent institutions.
• The government did not use an asset management company.

This is a rather intriguing guide to resolving the current sub-prime debacle. Note that the Norwegians avoided any moral hazard, refused to bail out speculators. It will be interesting to see  if the US can follow a similar path -- especially with the monoline insurers. Will share capital be written down to zero before committing public funds in firms such as Ambac (ABK), MBIA, FGIC ?

The alternative leads us to a situation where grossly speculative profits remain private, but systemic risk is public. This would be a wholly unsatisfactory conclusion.


A Norwegian perspective on banking crisis resolution
Kristin Gulbransen
Norges Bank, 16 June 2005
Conference on Banking Crisis Resolution - Theory and Policy, Oslo

Sunday, February 10, 2008 | 07:33 AM | Permalink | Comments (43) | TrackBack (0) add to | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Global Financial Crises, Part II: Norway 1987:


Way too wonky for a Sunday morning, no?

Posted by: Barry Ritholtz | Feb 10, 2008 8:23:08 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      


Complete Archives List



Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:

Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo



Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™