Quote of the Day: James Montier

Friday, July 25, 2008 | 03:00 PM

James is an unusually clear eyed analyst:

“In good times, few focus on such ‘mundane’ issues as earnings quality and footnotes. However, this lack of attention to ‘detail’ tends to come back and bite investors in the arse during bad times. There are notable exceptions to this generalization…

Contrary to the silly populist backlash which sees short sellers as rumor mongers and conspirators, they are actually amongst the most fundamentally driven of all the investors I interact with. Rather than being some malignant force within the markets, in my experience short sellers are closer to the accounting police (something the SEC once purported to do!).

Whilst companies often accuse short sellers of lying and conspiracy, it turns out that the accusers are often the guilty party. Owen Lamont from Chicago University has examined the battles between corporates and short sellers in the U.S. between 1977-2002. He found that ultimately it was the shorts that were right; the stocks underperformed the market by a cumulative 42% over three years after the start of the battle.”

-James Montier
Mind Matters: Cooking the books, or, More sailing under the black flag
June 30, 2008




via Welling@Weedon

Friday, July 25, 2008 | 03:00 PM | Permalink | Comments (15) | TrackBack (0)
de.li.cious add to de.li.cious | digg digg this! | technorati add to technorati | email email this post

bn-image

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef00e553b399f28833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Quote of the Day: James Montier:

Comments

Thanks for sharing that - it's so true and a lesson for the rest of us. In bad times we need to really be looking for good companies for when the turn-around starts...in the sweet bye and bye of course. And steer clear of bad, or worse, companies. Digging into what really makes a company work takes work and some little industry knowledge perhaps. FWIW here's a short guide: http://tinyurl.com/5leb6h

Bill Miller at Legg-Mason just got trimmed up by ignoring that problem, not least because he got into the Financials weigh too early without asking what's their context, what's the write-off picture, how might a slowing economy spread and, do their business models work. Even when we pay attention to fundamentals, e.g. PE Ratios, just because they've deteriorated doesn't mean they shouldn't have. A "cheap" price ain't if revenues and profits aren't being grown on a sustainable basis.
Not my business but it seems to me that anybody really investing these days needs to take more lessons from Warren than the talking heads.

Posted by: dblwyo | Jul 25, 2008 3:11:12 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.



Recent Posts

December 2008
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Archives

Complete Archives List

Blogroll

Blogroll

Category Cloud

On the Nightstand

On the Nightstand

 Subscribe in a reader

Get The Big Picture!
Enter your email address:


Read our privacy policy

Essays & Effluvia

The Apprenticed Investor

Apprenticed Investor

About Me

About Me
email me

Favorite Posts

Tools and Feeds

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Add to Google Reader or Homepage

Subscribe to The Big Picture

Powered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

FeedBurner


My Wishlist

Worth Perusing

Worth Perusing

mp3s Spinning

MP3s Spinning

My Photo

Disclaimer

Disclaimer

Odds & Ends

Site by Moxie Design Studios™

FeedBurner