Bloomberg: Blame the Ratings Agencies (Part I)
Huge special investigation in two parts from Bloomberg -- its a must read:
Frank Raiter says his former employer, Standard & Poor's, placed a "For Sale'' sign on its reputation on March 20, 2001. That day, a member of an S&P executive committee ordered him, the company's top mortgage official, to grade a real estate investment he'd never reviewed.
S&P was competing for fees on a $484 million deal called Pinstripe I CDO Ltd., Raiter says. Pinstripe was one of the new structured-finance products driving Wall Street's growth. It would buy mortgage securities that only an S&P competitor had analyzed; piggybacking on the rating violated company policy, according to internal e-mails reviewed by Bloomberg.
"I refused to go along with some of this stuff, and how they got around it, I don't know,'' says Raiter, 61, a former S&P managing director whose business unit rated 85 percent of all residential mortgage deals at the time. "They thought they had discovered a machine for making money that would spread the risks so far that nobody would ever get hurt.''
Relying on a competitor's analysis was one of a series of shortcuts that undermined credit grades issued by S&P and rival Moody's Corp., according to Raiter. Flawed AAA ratings on mortgage-backed securities that turned to junk now lie at the root of the world financial system's biggest crisis since the Great Depression, according to Raiter and more than 50 former ratings professionals, investment bankers, academics and consultants.
"I view the ratings agencies as one of the key culprits,'' says Joseph Stiglitz, 65, the Nobel laureate economist at Columbia University in New York. "They were the party that performed that alchemy that converted the securities from F- rated to A-rated. The banks could not have done what they did without the complicity of the ratings agencies.''
Gold Standard
Driven by competition for fees and market share, the New York-based companies stamped out top ratings on debt pools that included $3.2 trillion of loans to homebuyers with bad credit and undocumented incomes between 2002 and 2007. As subprime borrowers defaulted, the companies have downgraded more than three-quarters of the structured investment pools known as collateralized debt obligations issued in the last two years and rated AAA.
Without those AAA ratings, the gold standard for debt, banks, insurance companies and pension funds wouldn't have bought the products. Bank writedowns and losses on the investments totaling $523.3 billion led to the collapse or disappearance of Bear Stearns Cos., Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. and compelled the Bush administration to propose buying $700 billion of bad debt from distressed financial institutions.
Source:
Bringing Down Wall Street as Ratings Let Loose Subprime Scourge
Elliot Blair Smith
Bloomberg, Sept. 24 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=ah839IWTLP9s&
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 | 09:38 PM | Permalink
| Comments (38)
| TrackBack (0)
add to de.li.cious | digg this! | add to technorati | email this post
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c52a953ef010534cbb043970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bloomberg: Blame the Ratings Agencies (Part I):
Comments
AAA rated tulip backed securities.
The President explained all tonight. He wants the taxpayer to pay for all the tulip backed securities the banks hold, at prices just below what they were before the tulip mania burst. If the government holds them till term, the tulip backed securities will return to full value and make the taxpayer a profit. This will in turn stabilize the price of the tulips in the tulip gardens all Americans have in their backyards. The bailout is now a no brainer for me. Thank you Mr. President for clearing it all up. dc.
Posted by: dc | Sep 24, 2008 9:53:18 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.